1991
DOI: 10.1086/373461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Muṣannaf of ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Sanʿānī as a Source of Authentic Aḥādīth of the First Century A. H.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an effort to prove the authenticity of hadith, the primary source of analysis is the book of al-Mushannaf 'Abd Ar-Razzaq Ash-Shan'ani (W. 211 H) (Nugroho 2021) . With the sampling method (Adib 2017;Motzki 1991) and traditional-historical approach (Masrur 2013) . The conclusion of his research is that the materials in the book 'Abd al-Razzaq (which he claimed to have received from his four main informants -Ma'mar (d. 153 H), ibn Juraij (d. 150 H), al-Tsauri (d. 161 H) and ibn ' Uyainah (d. 198)-) are genuine (actually derived from the four authorities), not forged by 'Abd al-Razzaq (Amin, 2009) .…”
Section: Motzki Research Objectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an effort to prove the authenticity of hadith, the primary source of analysis is the book of al-Mushannaf 'Abd Ar-Razzaq Ash-Shan'ani (W. 211 H) (Nugroho 2021) . With the sampling method (Adib 2017;Motzki 1991) and traditional-historical approach (Masrur 2013) . The conclusion of his research is that the materials in the book 'Abd al-Razzaq (which he claimed to have received from his four main informants -Ma'mar (d. 153 H), ibn Juraij (d. 150 H), al-Tsauri (d. 161 H) and ibn ' Uyainah (d. 198)-) are genuine (actually derived from the four authorities), not forged by 'Abd al-Razzaq (Amin, 2009) .…”
Section: Motzki Research Objectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We must therefore -until the contrary is proven -star from the assumption that the tradition for which Ibn Jurayj expressly states a person as his source really came from that informant, and thus Ibn Jurayj's transmission, in my opinion, should be regarded as authentic. 18 Namun demikian, Motzki tidak berhenti di sini. Ia masih berusaha untuk menganalisis level berikutnya, dengan memfokuskan diri pada sumber yang paling sering dikutip oleh Ibn Jurayj, yaitu 'Aṭā' ibn Abī Rabah (w. 115/733).…”
Section: Metode Tradition-historical Dan Penerapannya Dalam Muṣannmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nor does it explain her choice to dwell at much greater length on early tafsīr literature (in chapters two and four), which is evidently much less useful than fiqh on all of these points. Leaving aside the numerous important studies that have established that a careful reading of legal texts can in fact tell us quite a lot about early Muslim society, 8 or that the historicity of some of the earliest and most valuable material has been demonstrated persuasively, 9 at the very least one must be aware that the sheer volume of extant early fiqh literature dwarfs tafsīr by a considerable degree. 10 By virtue of this point alone, it is likely to contain more relevant and useful information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%