2014
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-2014-06092-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multivariate arithmetic Tutte polynomial

Abstract: Abstract. We introduce an arithmetic version of the multivariate Tutte polynomial recently studied by Sokal, and a quasi-polynomial that interpolates between the two. We provide a generalized Fortuin-Kasteleyn representation for representable arithmetic matroids, with applications to arithmetic colorings and flows. We give a new proof of the positivity of the coefficients of the arithmetic Tutte polynomial in the more general framework of pseudo-arithmetic matroids. In the case of a representable arithmetic ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most natural combinatorial structure to consider in this context is of course the poset of layers C, both because this is the direct counterpart of the intersection poset of a hyperplane arrangement and because we already know it determines the Betti numbers and hence (by torsion-freeness) the cohomology groups. As an additional element of similarity, we prove in §7.1 that just as in the case of hyperplane arrangements the cohomology groups can be obtained as the Whitney homology of C. When the arrangement is centered (i.e., defined by kernels of characters), another associated structure is the arithmetic matroid of the defining characters [4]. While for hyperplane arrangements the two counterparts -(semi)lattice of flats and (semi)matroid -are equivalent combinatorial structures, in our situation it is still true that in the centered case C determines an arithmetic matroid, but it is not known at present how to construct C from an abstract arithmetic matroid.…”
Section: Combinatorial Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most natural combinatorial structure to consider in this context is of course the poset of layers C, both because this is the direct counterpart of the intersection poset of a hyperplane arrangement and because we already know it determines the Betti numbers and hence (by torsion-freeness) the cohomology groups. As an additional element of similarity, we prove in §7.1 that just as in the case of hyperplane arrangements the cohomology groups can be obtained as the Whitney homology of C. When the arrangement is centered (i.e., defined by kernels of characters), another associated structure is the arithmetic matroid of the defining characters [4]. While for hyperplane arrangements the two counterparts -(semi)lattice of flats and (semi)matroid -are equivalent combinatorial structures, in our situation it is still true that in the centered case C determines an arithmetic matroid, but it is not known at present how to construct C from an abstract arithmetic matroid.…”
Section: Combinatorial Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One such direction, from algebraic combinatorics, led Moci [25] to introduce a suitable generalization of the Tutte polynomials and then, jointly with d'Adderio [8], to the development of arithmetic matroids (for an up-to date account see Brändén and Moci [4]). These objects, as well as others like matroids over rings [18], exhibit an interesting structure theory and recover earlier enumerative results by Ehrenborg, Readdy and Slone [17] and Lawrence [21] but, as of yet, only bear an enumerative relationship with topological or geometric invariants of toric arrangements -in particular, these structures do not characterize their intersection pattern (one attempt towards closing this gap has been made by considering group actions on semimatroids [14]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 3.22 implies that the universal Tutte character satisfies a universal convolution formula in the polynomial algebra K[u 0 , v 0 , w 0 , u 1 , v 1 , w 1 , u 2 , v 2 , w 2 ]. One concludes by specializing the variables to (u 0 , v 0 , w 0 , u 1 , v 1 , w 1 , u 2 , v 2 , w 2 ) = (1, −cd, 1, −a, d, −e, −ab, 1, −ef ) and using (10).…”
Section: Delta-matroids and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arithmetic matroids [20,10] are one of several recently introduced kinds of decorated matroid. Matroids encode information about the topology of hyperplane arrangements: notably the graded dimension of the cohomology of a complex hyperplane arrangement complement is an evaluation of the Tutte polynomial.…”
Section: Arithmetic Matroidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation