2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19440-0_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Multiplicative Decomposition of the Deformation Gradient in Plasticity—Origin and Limitations

Abstract: The history of material equations and hence the development of present material theory as a method to describe the behavior of materials is closely related to the development of continuum theory and associated with the beginning of industrialization towards the end of the 19th century. While on the one hand new concepts such as continuum, stresses and strains, deformable body etc. were introduced by Cauchy, Euler, Leibniz and others and mathematical methods were provided to their description, the pressure of i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consistency requirement A = 0 over Eq. (50) when y > 0 yields the consistency requirement at any time t as 1 / AJ e ", :…”
Section: De E De E De Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The consistency requirement A = 0 over Eq. (50) when y > 0 yields the consistency requirement at any time t as 1 / AJ e ", :…”
Section: De E De E De Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent publication considering the numerics of the multiplicative decomposition, including combined isotropic-kinematic hardening models, can be found in [48]. However, the most controversial aspect of the theory is arguably associated with the derivation of continuum evolution equations for the plastic flow [49] and with their numerical integration [50], i.e. the "rate issue" as coined by Simo [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For two consecutive deformation gradients F 1 and F 2 , such that F = F 2 F 1 , E ( n ) = E 1 ( n ) + E 2 ( n ) is true if the logarithmic strain n = 0 is used. Here, E i ( n ) is defined as It means that the logarithmic strain can be additively decomposed for finite deformations [166]. For n 0 , E ( n ) can be written as …”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means that the logarithmic strain can be additively decomposed for finite deformations [166]. For n 0 , E ( n ) can be written as…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient F into two factors, "F e " and "F p " (say), has been fruitfully exploited in diverse areas of continuum mechanics, particularly in finite plasticity [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], thermoelasticity [21][22][23], and growth mechanics [24,25]. 1 In contrast to the purely kinematical right and left polar decompositions of F, in which the rotation tensor and each of the stretch tensors are uniquely defined, it is well-known that both F e and F p have an essential rotational non-uniqueness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%