2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2007.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multiple facets of homology and their use in comparative genomics to study the evolution of genes, genomes, and species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This definition is simple in principle, but complex combinations of lineage-specific gene duplications, losses and horizontal gene transfer events often give rise to intricate evolutionary scenarios and complicated relationships when considering more than a pair of genes (that is, when multiple paralogues and/or multiple species are involved) 6,14,1719 (BOX 1). This inherent complexity of the evolutionary scenarios drove the adoption of additional definitions to account for particular situations when comparing two or more genomes (BOX 1).…”
Section: Gene Homology Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This definition is simple in principle, but complex combinations of lineage-specific gene duplications, losses and horizontal gene transfer events often give rise to intricate evolutionary scenarios and complicated relationships when considering more than a pair of genes (that is, when multiple paralogues and/or multiple species are involved) 6,14,1719 (BOX 1). This inherent complexity of the evolutionary scenarios drove the adoption of additional definitions to account for particular situations when comparing two or more genomes (BOX 1).…”
Section: Gene Homology Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite efforts to capture the complexity of the evolutionary process, the characteristic penchant for simplicity in the descriptions of evolutionary scenarios in non-specialist scientific literature has given rise to widespread misuse and abuse of the orthology concept 17,19,28,29 . It remains rather common to equate orthology to functional equivalence and thus seek ‘functional orthologues’ 30,31 or to imply the necessary existence of a single ‘true orthologue’ of a given gene in any species.…”
Section: Gene Homology Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some work has already been performed in this area, both for prokaryotic genomes (e.g. Mirkin et al 2003; Descorps-Declère et al 2007) and for eukaryotic genomes (e.g. Koonin et al 2004).…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of homologous genes is a critical step to understand the evolutionary history of an organism. Homologs can be divided into two types: orthologs, which originated through a speciation event from a common ancestor and paralogs, which resulted from a duplication event [ 19 21 ]. This classification is critical to understanding the diversification processes because duplication events are often related to a posterior functional divergence [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%