2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing 2008
DOI: 10.1109/wicom.2008.2777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Multiple Attribute Decision-Making VIKOR Method and its Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can solve discrete decision problems with conflicting and non-commensurable (different units) criteria and provide a solution that is the closest to the ideal. It concentrates on selection and priority of a set of alternatives, and determine the just results for issues with conflicting criteria, while helping decision makers to gain a consensus decision Tzeng, 2004, 2007;Wei and Lin, 2008;Opricovic, 2011;Liu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Review On Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can solve discrete decision problems with conflicting and non-commensurable (different units) criteria and provide a solution that is the closest to the ideal. It concentrates on selection and priority of a set of alternatives, and determine the just results for issues with conflicting criteria, while helping decision makers to gain a consensus decision Tzeng, 2004, 2007;Wei and Lin, 2008;Opricovic, 2011;Liu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Review On Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the threat degree of small target is the biggest, and the threat degree of reconnaissance plane is the least. In order to facilitate quantitative study, in this paper, the target threat attribute is quantified by G. A. Miller's nine levels quantization theory [6], the reconnaissance plane, small target and large target were quantified for 3, 5 and 8.…”
Section: Target Type (K)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i and j denote the i th criterion and the j th alternative, and i w is the weight of i th criterion, the main steps of the method may be summarized as follows (Opricovic and Tzeng, 2004;Wei and Lin, 2008) (4) and (5).…”
Section: 13mentioning
confidence: 99%