2004
DOI: 10.1159/000077556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Multiparametric Scanning System for Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease in Hematological Malignancies

Abstract: Combined simultaneous analysis of morphology, immunophenotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization on the same cell offers advantages that may help to disclose the relevance of minimal residual disease (MRD) detection. Morphological analysis of small populations of cells related either to malignancy or recipient-associated markers may improve the accuracy of chimerism and MRD testing and delineate their clinical significance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined morphologic and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was performed using a new multiparametric cell scanning system (Duet™, BioView Ltd., Rehovot, Israel) [16, 17]. Monoclonality of the T-cells was established by spectratyping for the T-cell receptor gamma rearrangement [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined morphologic and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was performed using a new multiparametric cell scanning system (Duet™, BioView Ltd., Rehovot, Israel) [16, 17]. Monoclonality of the T-cells was established by spectratyping for the T-cell receptor gamma rearrangement [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of two I‐FISH experiments was performed by a multiparametric cell scanning Duet TM system (BioView Ltd, Rehovot, Israel) that provides combined analysis of morphology, immunocytochemistry and I‐FISH. In addition, this system enables the combined analysis of two I‐FISH examinations on the same cells (Trakhtenbrot et al , 2004). The technical procedures were previously described in detail (Shimoni et al , 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been tested successfully by us and by other authors. 29,30 Chromosome 8, chromosome 17, and MYC were chosen for the current analysis based on the literature and our previous studies. [20][21][22][23]25,31 Chromosome 8 is the site of several genes that have crucial functions in the tumorigenesis of several solid and hematopoietic malignancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%