Biological Magnetic Resonance 1980
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-6537-6_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Multinuclear NMR Approach to Peptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 274 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 In the first place, the changes in shift with temperature are in the direction expected for increasing hydrogen 12 and do not differ greatly from the -6 to -10 ppb/K for the temperature coefficients of amide proton resonances in extended-chain peptide and protein structures and the smaller temperature coeefficients of about -4 ppb/K for amides not accessible to solvent or hydrogen bonded in tighter protein environments. 13 Second, although, as mentioned earlier, the slopes of the shift changes with temperature do not differ much, the intercepts do change substantially with concentration. Third, as Figures 2-4 show, the cis and trans protons do not have the same slopes, which is consistent with differential hydrogen bonding involving these different types of protons.…”
Section: Self-associationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…11 In the first place, the changes in shift with temperature are in the direction expected for increasing hydrogen 12 and do not differ greatly from the -6 to -10 ppb/K for the temperature coefficients of amide proton resonances in extended-chain peptide and protein structures and the smaller temperature coeefficients of about -4 ppb/K for amides not accessible to solvent or hydrogen bonded in tighter protein environments. 13 Second, although, as mentioned earlier, the slopes of the shift changes with temperature do not differ much, the intercepts do change substantially with concentration. Third, as Figures 2-4 show, the cis and trans protons do not have the same slopes, which is consistent with differential hydrogen bonding involving these different types of protons.…”
Section: Self-associationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…NOESY (13) spectra (mixing time of 200-500 ms), TOCSY (14) spectra (mixing time of 70 ms) and DQF-COSY (15) spectra were acquired at 298 K and used for the assignment of the 1H-NMR resonances. Suppression of the H2O resonance for the NOESY, TOCSY and DQF-COSY spectra was achieved using pulse field gradients (16,17). Temperature coefficients (16) and hence the patterns of backbone hydrogen bonding were assessed by monitoring the chemical shift values of the amide backbone protons with changes in temperature (277, 285, 298 K) in the DQF-COSY and TOCSY experiments.…”
Section: Nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppression of the H2O resonance for the NOESY, TOCSY and DQF-COSY spectra was achieved using pulse field gradients (16,17). Temperature coefficients (16) and hence the patterns of backbone hydrogen bonding were assessed by monitoring the chemical shift values of the amide backbone protons with changes in temperature (277, 285, 298 K) in the DQF-COSY and TOCSY experiments. 2D data were processed on an O2 Silicon graphics work station using Felix 98 software.…”
Section: Nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppression of the H # O resonance for the NOESY and DQF-COSY spectra was achieved using pulse field gradients [15,16], while a presaturation pulse was employed for the TOCSY experiments. Temperature coefficients [17] and hence the patterns of backbone hydrogen bonding were assessed by monitoring the chemical shift values of the amide backbone protons with changes in temperature (277, 285, 298 K) in the DQF-COSY experiments. Two-dimensional data were processed on a Silicon Graphics O2 workstation using Felix 98 software.…”
Section: Nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%