2016
DOI: 10.1002/au.30058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Multi‐State Collaborative: A Preliminary Examination of Convergent Validation Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are unique challenges that come into play when using assignments designed for the classroom for institutional assessment. Chief among the concerns is the threat to validity that arises from the misalignment between the classroom assignment and the institutional assessment instrument used to adjudicate student learning (Nicholas, Hathcoat, and Brown 2016; Pike 2016; Pike, Hathcoat, and McConnell 2019). This misalignment also has implications for equity in assessment and can contribute to biased outcomes especially for the minoritized, underrepresented, and underserved students we seek to serve in higher education (Nicholas, Storandt, and Atwood 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are unique challenges that come into play when using assignments designed for the classroom for institutional assessment. Chief among the concerns is the threat to validity that arises from the misalignment between the classroom assignment and the institutional assessment instrument used to adjudicate student learning (Nicholas, Hathcoat, and Brown 2016; Pike 2016; Pike, Hathcoat, and McConnell 2019). This misalignment also has implications for equity in assessment and can contribute to biased outcomes especially for the minoritized, underrepresented, and underserved students we seek to serve in higher education (Nicholas, Storandt, and Atwood 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent report by McConnell and Rhodes (2017) provides promising results. However, some concerns still remain, particularly regarding the dependability of the measures (see Nicholas, Hathcoat, and Brown 2016; Pike, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%