2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-7494-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multi-objective robust optimization of the loading path in the T-shape tube hydroforming based on dual response surface model

Abstract: In this study, a dual response surface model-based multi-objective robust optimization method is introduced to deal with the uncertainties in the tube hydroforming process. The objective of this study is to maximize the protrusion height and minimize the thinning ratio; meanwhile, the variations of the objectives should be minimized. A valid finite element model obtained from experimental result and LS-DYNA is employed to simulate the T-shape tube hydroforming process. To improve computation efficiency, radial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of RSM to analysis THF process can be referred to [30,31]. The authors experienced the application of dual RBF for multi-objective robust optimization and the use of adaptive RBF to optimize the loading path for T-shape THF process [32,33]. An [34,35] used KRG to accelerate calculation speed in multi-objective optimization in THF process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of RSM to analysis THF process can be referred to [30,31]. The authors experienced the application of dual RBF for multi-objective robust optimization and the use of adaptive RBF to optimize the loading path for T-shape THF process [32,33]. An [34,35] used KRG to accelerate calculation speed in multi-objective optimization in THF process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copper-release response surface model (13) where C Cu µ is the mean response of copper release in mg/L, C Cu σ is the standard deviation response of copper release; T is the temperature in • C; Alk is the concentration of alkalinity in mg/L as calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ); SO 4 and SiO 2 are the concentrations of sulfates and silica in mg/L, respectively; A H+ is the molar concentration of the activity of hydrogen ions in 10 9 mol/L (in order to keep the same order of magnitude as the pH value). R 2 is the correlation coefficient.…”
Section: Dual Response Surface Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, it searches for an optimal set of input variables to optimize the response by using a set of designed experiments. In the past few years, several robust DRSO techniques have been developed [12,13]. Yanikoglu et al (2016) introduced Taguchi's Robust Parameter Design approach into DRSO to develop a method that uses only experimental data, and it can yield a solution that is robust against ambiguity in the probability of inputs [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, some efforts were drawn to use surrogates (e.g. hierarchal kriging [8]) instead of direct simulations for MCS or directly build surrogates [9,10] of mean and variance. Alternatively, people resort to develop formulations of mean and the variance directly by polynomial chaos expansion [11,12] and kriging [13][14][15] as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, by varying corresponding variables of optimized solution in its neighborhood of small range, UQ was conducted in an inner loop. Most of the UQ methods [8,9,11,[13][14][15] shown in the previous paragraph are designed for the uncertainty variables, which doesn't distinguish between optimization variables and uncertainty parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%