2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-013-5427-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multi-objective optimization of medium-speed WEDM process parameters for machining SKD11 steel by the hybrid method of RSM and NSGA-II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RSM technique is a useful method to handle this problem, and more details about RSM can be learned from references [11,15].…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RSM technique is a useful method to handle this problem, and more details about RSM can be learned from references [11,15].…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, two different methods, namely BPNN-GA and NSGA-II (coded by using Matlab 2014a), are proposed to optimize the process parameters of WEDM for obtaining the optimal surface integrity with minimizing SR,WLT, and SCD, which is the main objective of this research. Moreover, these two approaches have proven their effectiveness because they have been successfully implemented to find out the optimal parameters on material removal rate (MRR) and 3D surface quality of WEDM [11][12][13] or to optimize the process of laser brazing [14]. Finally, the confirmation experiment is conducted to verify the efficiency of these methods applied in optimizing surface integrity characteristics.…”
Section: Outline Of the Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To map the whole Pareto optimal frontier, the optimization procedure often should be repeated many times, which is a time-consuming process [18]. Evolutionary algorithms have been recognized to be well suited to multiobjective optimization, for example, one of the most efficient and commonly used versions of multi-objective GA (NSGA-II) can handle large and complex constraints by natural-inspired operators, and the NSGA-II algorithm has low computational complexity and good convergence by applying effective elite strategy than the previous evolutionary algorithms [15]; it has been successfully applied in solving many complex engineering optimization problems and achieved remarkable results [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. First of all, NSGA-II is selected to solve the multi-objective optimization model for oil-gas production process, and then, in order to further improve the diversity and convergence of Pareto optimal solutions obtained by NSGA-II algorithm when solving the complicated and constrained optimization problems, an improved NSGA-II algorithm (I-NSGA-II) is proposed in this paper.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimization For Oil-gas Production Process mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can obtain the true Pareto-optimal solutions by the elitepreserving compared to NSGA. And it is widely used to obtain the set of Pareto-optimal solutions to handle constrained multi-objective optimization problems [19]. So, this work adopts the NSGA-II algorithm to solve the multi-objective optimization problem.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%