2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-0927-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multi-objective non-probabilistic interval optimization of the loading paths for T-shape tube hydroforming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact finite element model of the forming process was prepared, and the created model verified in comparison with the experimental specimen. Huang et al [19] optimized the loading path in the hydroforming of a Tshaped tube based on the response surface and nonprobabilistic methods. The purpose of this research was to achieve the maximum protrusion and minimum thinning ratio with optimization of pressure path.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact finite element model of the forming process was prepared, and the created model verified in comparison with the experimental specimen. Huang et al [19] optimized the loading path in the hydroforming of a Tshaped tube based on the response surface and nonprobabilistic methods. The purpose of this research was to achieve the maximum protrusion and minimum thinning ratio with optimization of pressure path.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang ve ark. [9] T şekilli tüpü, hidro şekillendirme prosesi için yükleme şartlarını Pareto ve Taguchi yöntemlerini kullanarak optimize etmişlerdir. Yaptıkları nümerik çalışmalarla optimizasyon sonuçlarını doğrulamışlarıdır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Tapia et al built a surrogate model by applying Gaussian processes regression (GPR) to predict the melt pool depth of the laser powder bed fusion process [14]. Numerous methods have been applied in other studies to construct surrogate models; these methods include support vector regression (SVR) [15][16][17][18], the response surface methodology [19][20][21], kriging [22][23][24][25], and the adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%