2011
DOI: 10.3998/jmmh.10381607.0006.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Multi-Faith Religious Support Scale: Validation with a Sample of Muslim Women

Abstract: The Religious Support Scale (RSS; Fiala, Bjorck, & Gorsuch, 2002) includes Christian terminology (e.g., church, congregation), limiting its generalizability. We modified the RSS and assessed the reliability and validity of our new Multi-Faith Religious Support Scale (MFRSS) with 539 Muslim women in the United States. The MFRSS replicated the RSS's three-factor structure and subscale reliabilities. The three subscales respectively assess perceived support from religious peers (fellow adherents), from religious … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
53
3
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
53
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Gender is known to be related to religiosity (Bjorck & Maslim, ; Hanzaee, Mina, & Alikhan, ), and this study also finds that female consumers are more sensitive to the issue of stunning animals prior to slaughter than are males. Consumer age also appears to have influence over behaviour but not in a uniform manner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Gender is known to be related to religiosity (Bjorck & Maslim, ; Hanzaee, Mina, & Alikhan, ), and this study also finds that female consumers are more sensitive to the issue of stunning animals prior to slaughter than are males. Consumer age also appears to have influence over behaviour but not in a uniform manner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Moreover, in many studies, convenience sampling resulted in religious, ethnic, and socioeconomic compositions that did not match those of the larger Muslim community (Bjorck & Maslim, 2011;Chaudhury & Miller, 2008;Hasnain, Connell, Menon, & Tranmer, 2011;Khan, 2006;Rippy & Newman, 2006).…”
Section: Religious and Ethnic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These persons can even contribute by generating questionnaire themes or items (e.g., Haroun et al, 2011). Consultation can be obtained in group format (e.g., Asamarai et al, 2008;Bjorck & Maslim, 2011). For example.…”
Section: Designing the Research Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only females were included in this study since some researchers have noted gender differences in Muslim religious practice (Siddiqui, 2008). Additionally, Al-Solaim and Loewenthal (2011) in Saudi Arabia and Bjorck and Maslim (2011) in the USA, also employed exclusively female samples, so limiting our sample to females only allowed us to compare our findings with those from other studies. However, restricting the sample to females limits the generalisability of the findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%