1993
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.240531141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multi-center morphometric mammary carcinoma project (MMMCP) in the netherlands: Value of morphometrically assessed proliferation and differentiation

Abstract: The Multi-Center Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project (MMMCP) was set up to investigate the reproducibility and prognostic value of routine assessments of morphometric parameters [mean nuclear area (MNA), mitotic activity index (MAI), and multivariate prognostic index (MPI)] and cytometric features (DNA ploidy and index, % S-phase cells, as well as other cell cycle data) in comparison with classical prognostic parameters and steroid receptors. Thirty-four hospitals in six geographic regions participated. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, less frequent aberrations such as gains of 7q and l7q and losses of 11q, 13q, and 17p are consistent with other studies 5, 8, 18, 19. In agreement with other studies, MAI is the strongest independent morphological prognosticator in the current lymph node‐negative breast cancers (Figure 3) 1, 2, 20. Correlation between the MAI and specific chromosomal aberrations could thus provide us with a better insight into the underlying genetic mechanism and perhaps also point to a new prognostic genetic marker.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, less frequent aberrations such as gains of 7q and l7q and losses of 11q, 13q, and 17p are consistent with other studies 5, 8, 18, 19. In agreement with other studies, MAI is the strongest independent morphological prognosticator in the current lymph node‐negative breast cancers (Figure 3) 1, 2, 20. Correlation between the MAI and specific chromosomal aberrations could thus provide us with a better insight into the underlying genetic mechanism and perhaps also point to a new prognostic genetic marker.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A combination of tumour size, grade, and oestrogen receptor is often used for this purpose (St Gallen criterion). In addition, proliferation markers such as the mitotic activity index (MAI) and S‐phase are strong prognostic factors exceeding histological grade, as many independent studies have shown 1–3. Alterations in the genetic make‐up of tumour cells are at the basis of these phenotypic characteristics and the biological behaviour of a tumour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It had a restricted value in the premenopausal patients. On the other hand, MNA was useful in the premenopausal patients in European based studies (Baak et al,1993;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the numbers of apoptotic 26 and mitotic cells 15,27 are strong prognosticators for invasive breast cancer and also seem to be important in ductal CIS, 28 they did not appear to be useful for predicting breast cancer development in patients with a normal or hyperplastic breast biopsy. This is a disappointment, as it seems logical that proliferation and apoptosis (and especially the balance between these processes) would be critical for progression toward malignancy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%