1992
DOI: 10.1016/0923-5965(92)90019-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MPEG video compression algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…DCT is widely used in many practical image/video compression systems because of its compression performance and computational efficiency. DCT has been successfully selected as the first step in many coding systems, such as JPEG (Pennebake and Mitchell, 1993), MPEG (Le Gall, 1992), and H.26x (ITU Recommendation H.26,1 1993;ITU Telecom, 1998) due to its good properties of energy distribution in the frequency domain.…”
Section: Discrete Cosine Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DCT is widely used in many practical image/video compression systems because of its compression performance and computational efficiency. DCT has been successfully selected as the first step in many coding systems, such as JPEG (Pennebake and Mitchell, 1993), MPEG (Le Gall, 1992), and H.26x (ITU Recommendation H.26,1 1993;ITU Telecom, 1998) due to its good properties of energy distribution in the frequency domain.…”
Section: Discrete Cosine Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it achieves a good allocation of the bandwidth between DFD and motion parameters, and in this respect outperfonns the gradient and pel-recursive techniques. Furthennore, in the current standards MPEG-l [3 1], [32], MPEG-2 [33], [34], and H.261 [35] which are based on a DCT transfonn coding, block matching motion estimation techniques are clearly the most appropriate. Although it is clear that different results would be ob tained when using different gradient, pel-recursive and block matching algorithms, the above comments are gen erally true of these three groups of motion estimation techniques.…”
Section: Comparison Between Gradient Pel-recursive and Block Matcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, block matching motion estimation techniques are the most widely used in image sequence coding. Recent standards such as MPEG-l [31], [32], MPEG-2 [33], [34], and H.261 [35] are based on them, even though the algorithm to estimate the motion vectors is not specifi ed explicitly.…”
Section: Block Ma Tching Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations