1971
DOI: 10.7901/2169-3358-1971-1-489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Movement of Oil Spills

Abstract: The effects of winds, waves, and currents, and the physical properties of oil and water on the drift rates of oil spills were studied in tests carried out in a combined water basin wind tunnel On calm water, oil drifted at a fairly constant percentage of the wind speed regardless of the nature and spreading tendencies of the oil, the spill size, and water temperature, depth, and salinity. Percent drift varied with wind tunnel height. Extrapolation to infinite height indicated that on calm open water wind drift… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The empirical surface wind drift factor of 2% was strictly necessary to reproduce the observations because the easternmost part of the observed E80 surface slick moved eastward faster than the model could reproduce using drifter currents and Stokes drift alone. The resulting eastward surface drift, corresponding to about 3.5% of the wind speed (including Stokes drift of about 1.5% of the wind speed), is in good agreement with both empirical observations of Schwartzberg [] and the observed trajectories of the iSphere drifters (Figure ), which are designed to drift like surface oil. Whereas the Stokes drift is both well understood and well modeled, the physical mechanism behind this additional direct wind drift is not clear.…”
Section: Model Fit To Slick Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The empirical surface wind drift factor of 2% was strictly necessary to reproduce the observations because the easternmost part of the observed E80 surface slick moved eastward faster than the model could reproduce using drifter currents and Stokes drift alone. The resulting eastward surface drift, corresponding to about 3.5% of the wind speed (including Stokes drift of about 1.5% of the wind speed), is in good agreement with both empirical observations of Schwartzberg [] and the observed trajectories of the iSphere drifters (Figure ), which are designed to drift like surface oil. Whereas the Stokes drift is both well understood and well modeled, the physical mechanism behind this additional direct wind drift is not clear.…”
Section: Model Fit To Slick Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The isolated effect of this process on the larger spatial and temporal scales considered here is not well known, and cannot easily be distinguished from the overall effect of other turbulent processes (e.g., Langmuir turbulence), making the problem very complicated. Considering in addition that Schwartzberg [] found no dependence of the wind drift factor on oil properties, we find it reasonable to use the same constant wind drift factor for both oil types. For the plant oil, the surface windage did not make a significant difference in any case because the oil particles spent much more time entrained than at the surface.…”
Section: Model Fit To Slick Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Together with the Stokes drift (typically 1.5% of the wind at the surface), this sums up to the commonly found empirical value of 3.5% of the wind (Schwartzberg, 1971). …”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…Lagrangian tools fall in two broad categories: either the trajectories are computed along with the velocity fields as part of the ocean or atmospheric circulation model, e.g. socalled floats in the regional ocean modelling system (ROMS) (Shchepetkin and McWilliams, 2005). This is known as "online" trajectory computations and has the advantage that no separate model is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%