2023
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02218-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The move towards living systematic reviews and living guidelines in healthcare: consideration of the possibilities and challenges for living qualitative evidence syntheses

Abstract: Over the past decade qualitative evidence synthesis (QES), a range of methods for synthesising qualitative research evidence, has become a valued form of evidence for guideline producers who wish to understand more about patient preference and acceptability of treatments. The surge in interest in living systematic reviews and the appearance of living guidelines as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic potentially weaken the value and usability of QES.There are currently no published methods for producing living … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We generate a living and adaptive evidence map, based on a comprehensive systematic literature search. 15 An evidence map aims at mapping out, categorising and charting existing topical literature without its formal critical or quality assessment or synthesis. 16 A living approach enables the continuous monitoring, consideration and integration of newly published studies into the body of evidence throughout the duration of the FreiZeit project.…”
Section: Methods and Analysis Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We generate a living and adaptive evidence map, based on a comprehensive systematic literature search. 15 An evidence map aims at mapping out, categorising and charting existing topical literature without its formal critical or quality assessment or synthesis. 16 A living approach enables the continuous monitoring, consideration and integration of newly published studies into the body of evidence throughout the duration of the FreiZeit project.…”
Section: Methods and Analysis Designmentioning
confidence: 99%