1991
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(91)90147-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The motor effect of neuromedin U on rat stomach in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
20
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
9
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of relevance to the present study are the observations that NmU mediates contraction of canine (Westfall et al, 2001) and human colon (Jones et al, 2006) but not colon from rat, guinea pig, or mouse (Benito-Orfila et al, 1991;Prendergast et al, 2006). The lack of a direct effect of NmU on contraction of mouse colon has been supported by a recent study, although it did potently enhance electrically stimulated, nerve-evoked contractions, possibly through prejunctional effects within the enteric ganglia (Dass et al, 2007).…”
Section: Neuromedin U Signaling In Smooth Musclesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Of relevance to the present study are the observations that NmU mediates contraction of canine (Westfall et al, 2001) and human colon (Jones et al, 2006) but not colon from rat, guinea pig, or mouse (Benito-Orfila et al, 1991;Prendergast et al, 2006). The lack of a direct effect of NmU on contraction of mouse colon has been supported by a recent study, although it did potently enhance electrically stimulated, nerve-evoked contractions, possibly through prejunctional effects within the enteric ganglia (Dass et al, 2007).…”
Section: Neuromedin U Signaling In Smooth Musclesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…We observed no difference in the intestinal transit of a charcoal-based marker between wild-type and NmU Tg mice. Although NmU stimulates ileal smooth muscle contraction in dogs and humans in vitro (Maggi et al 1990, Westfall et al 2002, it failed to stimulate porcine jejunum, guinea pig ileal smooth muscle, and rat small and large intestinal longitudinal smooth muscle in vitro (Minamino et al 1985a, Brown & Quito 1988, Benito-Orfila et al 1991. The absence of a difference between wild-type and NmU Tg mice in this regard is therefore not entirely surprising, and indicates that changes in intestinal motility are probably not involved in the phenotype observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Recent work, however, has shown that central administration of NmU decreases gastric acid secretion and slows gastric emptying in rats (Mondal et al 2003), potentially affecting meal size and frequency. This contrasts with studies showing that NmU directly stimulates contraction of rat fundic circular smooth muscle in vitro (Benito-Orfila et al 1991). Given that there are species differences in smooth muscle contractility in response to NmU in vitro, studies examining gastric emptying and nutrient absorption are required to fully assess whether changes in GI smooth muscle physiology play a role in the phenotype of these Tg mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Since then, neuromedin U has been found to show various biological activities including the elevation of blood pressure and the induction of adrenocorticotropin and corticosterone release in vivo in rats (1,(3)(4)(5)(6)). Applying our previously described strategy to identify endogenous ligands for orphan G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) 1 (7-9), we recently succeeded in demonstrating that the orphan GPCR, FM-3, a homologue of the neurotensin (NT) and growth hormone secretagogue receptors, is a specific and functional receptor for neuromedin U (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%