2019
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci9010006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Motivational Power of the Happy Face

Abstract: People who are cheerful have better social relationships. This might be the case because happy faces communicate an invitation to interact. Thus, happy faces might have a strong motivational effect on others. We tested this hypothesis in a set of four studies. Study 1 (N = 94) showed that approach reactions to happy faces are faster than other reactions to happy or angry faces. Study 2 (N = 99) found the same effect when comparing reactions to happy faces with reactions to disgusted faces. Supporting the notio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the gamma band, as expected for the TD group, we observed a pattern of connectivity in a network known to be involved in emotion processing, which included orbital frontal and limbic regions ( Pessoa, 2017 ). We also observed greater connectivity strength for happy compared to angry faces in the TD group, also as expected from the extensive literature showing a happy face advantage (e.g., Kirita and Endo, 1995 ) in that happy faces are preferred, engaging, invitational and approachable (e.g., Becker et al, 2011 ; Nikitin and Freund, 2019 ). The ADHD group showed a similar pattern to the TD; however, the ASD showed the opposite effect with angry faces inducing greater connectivity in this network than happy faces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In the gamma band, as expected for the TD group, we observed a pattern of connectivity in a network known to be involved in emotion processing, which included orbital frontal and limbic regions ( Pessoa, 2017 ). We also observed greater connectivity strength for happy compared to angry faces in the TD group, also as expected from the extensive literature showing a happy face advantage (e.g., Kirita and Endo, 1995 ) in that happy faces are preferred, engaging, invitational and approachable (e.g., Becker et al, 2011 ; Nikitin and Freund, 2019 ). The ADHD group showed a similar pattern to the TD; however, the ASD showed the opposite effect with angry faces inducing greater connectivity in this network than happy faces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although it was not the focus of Experiment 2, it is interesting to note that the response bias towards happy over angry face is in line with previous studies showing that whereas happy faces elicit an approach response, angry faces elicit an avoid response (Marsh et al, 2005;Nikitin & Freund, 2019;Phaf et al, 2014;Stins et al, 2011). It is likely that this effect is mainly visible when participants are unsure of their responses, that is in guess responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…On the contrary, the focus of the participants on the putative region of the Head when looking at Happy bodily postures is in line with the human, and non-human primates, well-established tendency to look at the face, and specifically at the eyes, during positive and affiliative interactions (i.e. approach; see Nikitin & Freund, 2019;Kret et al, 2017;McFarland et al, 2013). This predisposition may be underpinned by a network of interconnected cortical regions comprising the frontal oculomotor region, the temporal sectors encoding the emotional content of facial stimuli ("the dorsal stream for faces"; Bernstein & Yovel, 2015), and a sector of the anterior cingulate cortex recently demonstrated to be active during the production and the perception of smile/ laughter expression ("mirror mechanism" for laughter; Caruana et al, 2017Caruana et al, , 2018.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%