2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep04(2020)030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The motivation and status of two-body resonance decays after the LHC Run 2 and beyond

Abstract: Searching for two-body resonance decays is a central component of the high energy physics energy frontier research program. While many of the possibilities are covered when the two bodies are Standard Model (SM) particles, there are still significant gaps. If one or both of the bodies are themselves non-SM particles, there is very little coverage from existing searches. We review the status of two-body searches and motivate the need to search for the missing combinations. It is likely that the search program o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e + e + µ − µ − , that can naturally emerge easily, but that have thus far skirted systematic signature classification programs, see e.g. [3,44,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e + e + µ − µ − , that can naturally emerge easily, but that have thus far skirted systematic signature classification programs, see e.g. [3,44,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that both among experimentalists and theorists, there is actually growing interest in going beyond the intensively studied paradigm of a heavy resonance decaying into two SM particles, i.e., in considering a (lighter) BSM resonance among the decay products of the heavy resonance [37]. Our work here (and earlier papers on gauge KK signals) is in line with this effort; in particular, gauge KK decays into radion fit into group II/table 2 of [37], whereas the KK graviton decay into a pair of radions belongs to group Y/table 5, with KK graviton decay into KK gluon falling into group IV/table 4.…”
Section: Jhep11(2020)109mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way of alleviating this fear is to develop new searches that are as independent of theory prejudices as possible. For example, by focusing on simplified topologies wholly independent of theory motivation, it is possible to identify bumps in various invariant mass distributions that are not subject to any published LHC constraints but are amenable to straightforward analyses [34,35]. Another option is to replace theorists with machines, e.g.…”
Section: Who Ordered That?mentioning
confidence: 99%