The Motivating Effect of Money

Selection bias, vote counting, and money-priming effects: A comment on Rohrer, Pashler, and Harris (2015) and Vohs (2015).

“…In one case(Mukherjee, Manjaly, Kumar, & Shah, 2015), we were unable to contact the authors of the study. In three cases(Park, Gasiorowska, & Vohs, 2015;Sarial-Abi, Hamilton, & Vohs, 2015;Sarial-Abi & Vohs, 2015), we were able to contact the first authors, but they preferred not to share their manuscripts or disclose more details of the statistical analyses. Although irrelevant for our present analyses, the authors alerted us that two of these papers(Sarial-Abi et al, 2015;Sarial-Abi & Vohs, 2015) actually refer to different experiments of a single manuscript in preparation.…”

“…In three cases(Park, Gasiorowska, & Vohs, 2015;Sarial-Abi, Hamilton, & Vohs, 2015;Sarial-Abi & Vohs, 2015), we were able to contact the first authors, but they preferred not to share their manuscripts or disclose more details of the statistical analyses. Although irrelevant for our present analyses, the authors alerted us that two of these papers(Sarial-Abi et al, 2015;Sarial-Abi & Vohs, 2015) actually refer to different experiments of a single manuscript in preparation. During the review of the present article, an anonymous reviewer revealed that the data reported byChatterjee, Rose, and Sinha (2013) are under investigation because several lines of evidence suggest that they are tainted(Pashler, Rohrer, Abramson, Wolfson, & Harris, 2016).…”