2019
DOI: 10.5539/elt.v12n7p120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Most Frequent Errors in Academic Writing: A Case of EFL Undergraduate Arab Students in Israel

Abstract: The current study examined the most common types of academic writing errors and the causes of such errors made by 44 tertiary EFL Arab-Israeli students. A methodological triangulation was employed in this research. Results and analyses of errors in the written samples revealed that students made a substantial number of errors in both rating scales. In the generic writing performance scale (the qualitative method), 75% of students’ written samples rated poor, and the error frequency rating scale (the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A third Grammar/Syntactic error subcategory that is widely evident in our results relates to the "fluctuation" of articles (A10), as manifested by the tendency among EFL Arab speakers to misuse this noun modifier by fluctuating between "the" and "a/ an" (Jaensch and Sarko, 2009). This observation has been described by other researchers including Folse (2008), Scott and Tucker (1974) and Chaleila & Garra-Alloush (2019) and can be attributed to the contrast between the English article system and that used in Arabic. Similar errors have been discussed concerning Japanese EFL learners, apparently due to the differences between the use of articles in Japanese and English, concerning the "fluctuation" of the definite article "the" with the indefinite article "a/an" among Japanese learners.…”
Section: Grammar Errorssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A third Grammar/Syntactic error subcategory that is widely evident in our results relates to the "fluctuation" of articles (A10), as manifested by the tendency among EFL Arab speakers to misuse this noun modifier by fluctuating between "the" and "a/ an" (Jaensch and Sarko, 2009). This observation has been described by other researchers including Folse (2008), Scott and Tucker (1974) and Chaleila & Garra-Alloush (2019) and can be attributed to the contrast between the English article system and that used in Arabic. Similar errors have been discussed concerning Japanese EFL learners, apparently due to the differences between the use of articles in Japanese and English, concerning the "fluctuation" of the definite article "the" with the indefinite article "a/an" among Japanese learners.…”
Section: Grammar Errorssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In addition to the challenges deriving from diglossia, the existence of two languages in one community (Ferguson, 1959) that all Arabic-speaking EFL learners must contend with, those in Israel have a further encumbrance in the form of triglossia, which not only complicates their English learning generally, but renders speaking that language particularly complex and daunting due to "three-faceted interferences" (Chaleila and Garra-Alloush, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As pointed out previously, Arabic-speaking groups of English learners are often trilingual and are frequent participants in research on language teaching. Their learning challenges in the EFL classroom are studied from a variety of perspectives ranging from the educational system that might hinder their success in learning English through applied linguistic queries, such as the most frequent errors in academic writing (Chaleila & Garra-Alloush, 2019), to the content of English textbooks and their suitability for the Arabic-speaking population (Amara, 2017).…”
Section: Multilingual Language Learnersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the students were provided with four academic sources. The test lasted two hours and was followed by a thorough assessment of students' writing performance and the writing errors drawn from this test were listed in accordance with their type and frequency (Chaleila & Garra-Alloush, 2019). That is, accuracy of students' writing was measured by using an error analysis.…”
Section: Pre-testmentioning
confidence: 99%