2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00015-010-0007-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Moslavačka Gora crystalline massif in Croatia: a Cretaceous heat dome within remnant Ordovician granitoid crust

Abstract: For a long time the Moslavačka Gora Massif in Croatia has been regarded as a major outcrop of Variscan crystalline basement of the South Tisia block. However, new geochronological data indicate that this massif consists of a Cretaceous S-type granite pluton intruding a Cretaceous low-pressure/high-temperature (LP/HT) metamorphic envelope. The age of the LP/HT metamorphism is estimated at *90-100 Ma using the method of electron microprobe based monazite dating. The Central Granite was dated at 82 ± 1 Ma (LA-SF-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a first instance, it appears to suggest that the Sava Ocean was already closed in this segment of the Dinarides, in contrast with previously proposed latest Cretaceous age of collision [ Schmid et al , ; Ustaszewski et al , ]. The late Cretaceous extension of the Medvednica Mountains is in agreement with the ~100–90 Ma event of low‐pressure high‐temperature regional metamorphism followed by decompressional melting and emplacement of a granitic pluton at ~82 Ma during a period of crustal uplift, which is observed immediately eastward in the Moslavačka Gora Mountains [ Balen and Petrinec , ; Balen et al , ; Starijaš et al , ]. However, the earlier closure of the Sava Ocean is contradicted by the observation of late Cretaceous intraoceanic magmatism and the inferred latest Cretaceous age of collision more eastward in the region of Kozara Mountains situated in a central position along the northern Dinaridic border [ Ustaszewski et al , ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a first instance, it appears to suggest that the Sava Ocean was already closed in this segment of the Dinarides, in contrast with previously proposed latest Cretaceous age of collision [ Schmid et al , ; Ustaszewski et al , ]. The late Cretaceous extension of the Medvednica Mountains is in agreement with the ~100–90 Ma event of low‐pressure high‐temperature regional metamorphism followed by decompressional melting and emplacement of a granitic pluton at ~82 Ma during a period of crustal uplift, which is observed immediately eastward in the Moslavačka Gora Mountains [ Balen and Petrinec , ; Balen et al , ; Starijaš et al , ]. However, the earlier closure of the Sava Ocean is contradicted by the observation of late Cretaceous intraoceanic magmatism and the inferred latest Cretaceous age of collision more eastward in the region of Kozara Mountains situated in a central position along the northern Dinaridic border [ Ustaszewski et al , ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…To the SW of the studied area in Žumberak Mountains (Figure b), the Žumberak nappe thrusts mainly Upper Triassic dolomites, similar in facies to the Carnian‐Norian Hauptdolomit (or Dolomia Principale) of the Southern Alps, over an ophiolitic mélange and Cretaceous‐Paleogene sediments (Figure b) [ Tomljenović , ]. Interestingly, the Upper Triassic shallow‐water facies of the Žumberak nappe contrasts with coeval deep‐water facies documented in the internal part of the Dinarides following the overall deepening of the Adriatic passive continental margin [e.g., Dimitrijević , ; Starijaš et al , ; Toljić et al , ]. Thus, when compared with the facies of typical internal Dinaridic nappes, which include the Medvednica Mountains [see Schmid et al , ], the paleogeographic provenance of the Žumberak nappe is different.…”
Section: Interpretation: Integrated Structural and Thermochronologicasupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Discrete magmatic centres along the Sava zone include Moslovačka Gora (Starijaš, Gerdes, Balen, Tibljas, & Finger, et al. ), Požeška Gora (Pamić & Šparica, ) and Prosara (Ustaszewski et al., ) in Croatia, Kozara (Ustaszewski et al., ) in Bosnia and Tešića Majdan (Prelević, Wehrheim, Božović, Romer, & Boev, ) in Serbia (Figure ). The origin and geodynamic significance of these centres have been considered either enigmatic (Ustaszewski et al., ) or clearly not ophiolitic (Cvetković et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We mapped its northern contact with the Mecsek nappe system after Csontos & Vörös (2004). However, we excluded the basement that crops out in the Moslavačka Gora inselberg in Croatia, previously considered as the westernmost tip of Tisza, from the Mecsek nappe system, and attributed it to the Sava Zone owing to the occurrence of mid-Cretaceous gabbros (109 ± 8 Ma; Balen et al 2003) and Late Cretaceous-age high-temperature metamorphism and magmatism (Starijaš et al 2006). The southern contact between the Bihor and the Codru nappe system is rather poorly constrained by subsurface data, except for the area south of Debrecen, where S-dipping reflectors indicate a shear zone (Posgay et al 2006, their Fig.…”
Section: Tectonic Contacts Between Tisza and Neighbouring Units Timimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2c) Unfortunately, near Zagreb there are no exposures of the Sava Zone in the area of the junction of the Mid-Hungarian Fault Zone that includes the ophiolitic "Intra-Pannonian Belt" (Channell et al 1979) and the westernmost parts of the ophiolite-bearing Sava belt of the Dinarides. Furthermore, the tectonic position of the Moslavačka Gora inselberg, characterized by Cretaceous-age gabbros (109 ± 8 Ma, Balen et al 2003) and Late Cretaceous metamorphism and magmatism (Starijaš et al 2006), is not very clear. Although traditionally attributed to the Tisza Mega-Unit, we interpreted the Moslavačka Gora inselberg as part of the Sava Zone, guided by the fact that areas with a strong Mesozoic metamorphic overprint are unknown from the adjacent internal Dinarides and the Tisza Unit.…”
Section: Ophiolites Obducted Onto the Adria Margin: The Western Vardamentioning
confidence: 99%