1952
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1952.tb02262.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Morphology of the Head of Larval Hymenoptera With Special Reference to the Head of the Ichneu‐monoidea, Including a Classification of the Final Instar Larvae of the Braconidae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

24
39
1
4

Year Published

1970
1970
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
24
39
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…. This figure agrees generally with that given for Scambusl in Short (1959), although teeth are not shown on the mandible. .…”
Section: Methods Terminology and Classificationsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…. This figure agrees generally with that given for Scambusl in Short (1959), although teeth are not shown on the mandible. .…”
Section: Methods Terminology and Classificationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…SOC. This classification accepts the larval character suggested by Short (1959 : 400) for the subfamily: that the hypostomal spur meets the stipital sclerite on or near the point of meeting of this and the labial sclerite. 122.…”
Section: Methods Terminology and Classificationsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…General terminology used in the larval descriptions follows Vance and Smith (1933) as well as Short (1952). Our terminology is also consistent with Cutler’s (1955) work on Pteromalidae larval head morphology and the referred previous studies of Gómez et al (2008, 2011, 2013), Gómez and Nieves (2012) and Nieves-Aldrey et al (2007) on the larvae of Torymidae, Eurytomidae and Pteromalidae.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Comments on morphological changes that may occur during each stage were added after the diagnoses. For cephalic capsule chaetotaxy, last instar larvae were used as model since the distribution of setae is the same for all larval instars and prepupa (Short, 1952).…”
Section: Morphological Characterization Of Immature Stages and Develomentioning
confidence: 99%