2014
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2014.610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The morphodynamics of a swash event on an erodible beach

Abstract: A high-accuracy numerical solution, coupling one-dimensional shallow water and bed-evolution equations, with, for the first time, a suspended sediment advection equation, thereby including bed and/or suspended load, is used to examine two swash events on an initially plane erodible beach: the event of Peregrine & Williams (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 440, 2001, pp. 391–399) and that of a solitary wave approaching the beach. Equations are solved by the method of characteristics, and the numerical model is verified… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

8
61
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the overall pattern of erosion / deposition is unchanged. This is consistent with Zhu & Dodd (2015), who also noted that this parameter affects primarily the amount of erosion / deposition (per unit time) rather than the pattern, unless the flow is significantly affected by the bed change (see (A.3)-(A.6)). These values of m e span a range of M 375 values from 5 × 10 −4 -2 × 10 −3 (see Fig.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Parameterssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen that the overall pattern of erosion / deposition is unchanged. This is consistent with Zhu & Dodd (2015), who also noted that this parameter affects primarily the amount of erosion / deposition (per unit time) rather than the pattern, unless the flow is significantly affected by the bed change (see (A.3)-(A.6)). These values of m e span a range of M 375 values from 5 × 10 −4 -2 × 10 −3 (see Fig.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Parameterssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These values of m e span a range of M 375 values from 5 × 10 −4 -2 × 10 −3 (see Fig. 16 of Zhu & Dodd (2015)). The larger value corresponds to the uprush movement of around 60 kg/m of sand, which is consistent with field observations (see Blenkinsopp et al, 2011).…”
Section: Sensitivity To Parametersmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations