The Morning Report iBook - A Novel Aprroach to the Internal Medicine Morning Report

Liederman, Zachary; Patafio, Francis M.; Green, Jordan J.; Morton, Ross; Taylor, David

doi:10.22374/cjgim.v11i2.144

Cited by 2 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The scoping review focused on programs within North America. The majority of included studies (34 studies) were conducted in the United States of America (85.0%) 2,28,34,29,22,30,35,36,37,38,39,40,40,41,42,43,23,31,44,45,24,46, 47,33,25,26,20,21,48,49,50,51,52,53 and 6 studies 54,55,56,57,58,32 were conducted in Canada (15.0%). Two studies had international impact with learners globally using the morning report blog and The Clinical Problem Solvers podcast (Table 1).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Twenty-five studies (62.5%) were conducted among general internal medicine programs, 2,22,25,26,50,29,30,31,33,44,42,55,40, 41,54,53,39,37,36,58,35,49,52 4 studies (10.0%) included family medicine learners, 21,40,39,37,59 4 studies (10.0%) were conducted in neurology programs, 23,24,57,32 1 study in nephrology (2.5%), 42 1 study (2.5%) in rheumatology, 56 2 studies (5.0%) in cardiology, 28,45 and 2 studies (5.0%) in other programs (Table 1). 34,48…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most studies explored the impact of virtual morning report (VMR) on knowledge acquisition and retention. 21,23,25,29,30,34,35,36,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,46,47, 48,49,50,51,52,53,55,56,62,63,60,65 Two studies also evaluated if VMR improved efficiency and time spent learning 38,56 and two studies explored association between the VMR format and cognitive learning styles. 36,37 Six studies reported on clinical outcomes in the areas of inpatient diabetes management, osteoporosis, chronic back pain, opioid prescribing, and advanced care planning (Table 1).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two studies had international impact with learners globally using the morning report blog and The Clinical Problem Solvers podcast (Table 1). 54,25 Programs and specialties: Twenty-five studies (62.5%) were conducted among general internal medicine programs, 2,22,25,26,50,29,30,31,33,44,42,55,40,41,54,53,39,37,36,58,35,49,52 4 studies (10.0%) included family medicine learners, 21,40,39,37,59 4 studies (10.0%) were conducted in neurology programs, 23,24,57,32 1 study in nephrology (2.5%), 42 1 study (2.5%) in rheumatology, 56 2 studies (5.0%) in cardiology, 28,45 and 2 studies (5.0%) in other programs (Table 1). 34,48 Level of training: Table 1 demonstrates the percentage of participants across medical school, residency, and fellowship.…”

Section: Countriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Competing Interests: All authors declare that they have no competing interests or disclosures. 2,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,28,29,30,31,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,60 Canada 6 (15.0%) 32,54,55,56,58,57 Programs/specialties General internal medicine 25 (62.5%) 2,22,25,26,29,30,31,33,35,36,37,…”

Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A scoping review of virtual morning report and outcomes in Canada and the United States

Sarma

Kanagalingam

Lai³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To describe the current landscape of virtual morning report (VMR) in medical residency education including its varying formats, methods, and associated effectiveness on learning and clinical outcomes. Methods: The authors conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and OMalley methodology. They searched Embase, OvidMEDLINE, Google Scholar, and PubMed between January 1, 1991 to April 15, 2022. Articles written in English on virtual morning report and virtual case-based teaching in medical residency programs were captured. Two authors independently screened articles using the inclusion criteria. Using a snowball approach, further citations were identified from included references. Two authors performed data extraction including outcomes using the Kirkpatrick model. We conducted thematic analysis using an iterative process. Results: A total of 401 citations were screened for eligibility and we included 40 articles. The number of published studies per year on VMR increased since the COVID-19 pandemic. Most studies used online case-based modules (n=20, 50.0%) or videoconferencing (n=12, 30.0%). The majority of studies described improved confidence with clinical reasoning, easy access, and preference for chatboxes and polls for engagement (Kirpatrick level 1). Nineteen studies demonstrated improved knowledge acquisition with pre-and post-test scores (Kirkpatrick level 2). Behaviour changes (Kirkpatrick level 3) included improved screening tests and medication prescribing. There were no studies on clinical outcomes (Kirkpatrick level 4). Thematic analyses revealed that VMR increased clinical reasoning, efficiently used technology, provided an inclusive environment for diverse learners, but reduced peer engagement and bedside teaching. Conclusion: Virtual morning report has a positive impact on learner confidence, knowledge, inclusivity, accessibility, and behaviour change. Future research is needed to explore the impact on patient outcomes as well as identify strategies for peer engagement and social interaction.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Countriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A scoping review of virtual morning report and outcomes in Canada and the United States

Sarma

Kanagalingam

Lai³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Morning Report Practice and Its Contribution to Education of Internal Medicine Residents: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia

Al Qarni,

Habib,

Abdelgadir

et al. 2023

AMEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Morning Report (MR) is a ubiquitous traditional educational activity in internal medicine residency training. It is under-researched; hence, this study was conducted. It aimed to examine the practice of MR by internal medicine residents, their motivation to engage with it, and their perception of its contribution to education. Methods: This was a multi-center cross-sectional study. The data was collected using an online self-administered 12-item questionnaire that covered MR practice, respondents' motivation for participation, MR contribution to education, and its impact on the practice of evidence-based medicine and quality improvement and patient safety. Results: One hundred seventy residents returned the online questionnaire (54.7%). The respondents' gender and year of training were balanced (P > 0.05). The most common MR frequency and duration were five days per week (85.4%) and 45-60 minutes (47.1%), respectively. The most common format was handover combined with an emergency long case presentation (55.8%), and consultants were the most common facilitators (79.7%). The respondents' motivation to engage with MR was predominantly intermediate. The top reasons for attending and not attending MR were mandatory attendance and embarrassing questions, respectively. The perceived MR contribution to residents' different roles development was predominantly intermediate; however, it was predominantly very low/low (42%) for overall education. The perceived MR impact on the practice of EBM and QIPS were both predominantly intermediate. Conclusion:MR was found to be a commonly practiced educational activity in internal medicine residency training programs in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia. The case discussion was the core format for education. The respondents' motivation to participate in MR and their perception of its contribution to education was predominantly intermediate. To our best knowledge, this is the first study in Saudi Arabia that examined MR. We hope its findings will be taken for further MR studies and actions for improvement.

show abstract

The Morning Report iBook - A Novel Aprroach to the Internal Medicine Morning Report

Abstract: Morning Report is an integral element of residency education, however, changes in training have limited its effectiveness. To improve the effectiveness and accessibility of Morning Report, we developed an innovative electronic teaching resource.

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

A scoping review of virtual morning report and outcomes in Canada and the United States

A scoping review of virtual morning report and outcomes in Canada and the United States

The Morning Report Practice and Its Contribution to Education of Internal Medicine Residents: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About