1976
DOI: 10.1080/03626784.1976.11075526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Moribund Curriculum Field: Its Wake and Our Work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

1978
1978
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…At that time, the curriculum field, many readers will recall, was judged as moribund, dead, and arrested by Joseph Schwab (1970), Dwayne Huebner (1976), and William Pinar (1978), respectively. Concerns and questions notwithstanding, no commentator would regard the present field in these terms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At that time, the curriculum field, many readers will recall, was judged as moribund, dead, and arrested by Joseph Schwab (1970), Dwayne Huebner (1976), and William Pinar (1978), respectively. Concerns and questions notwithstanding, no commentator would regard the present field in these terms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Even reasoned efforts to unify the faithful and restore the sense of community mostly missing since the 1960s sometimes did the opposite. For instance, Huebner (1976) re-emphasized the ontological basis in curriculum work for the locus of subject matter. Of Dewey's three loci, subject matter was then the least emphasized by THE CORPUS AND THE INCORPOREAL OF CURRICULUM 87 the faithful, no doubt in reaction to the idolatries of the 1960s, but perhaps also because it was the least emphasized by Schwab's reinterpretation of Dewey.…”
Section: George Willis/cimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has been a little more than 40 years since Schwab (1969) declared the field moribund, and 35 years since Huebner (1976) pronounced it dead. Over the years, it has been noted by numerous scholars that the curriculum field has been in a state of crisis (e.g., Barrow, 1984;Greene, 1975;Grumet, 1990;Huebner, 1962;Pinar, Reynolds, Slattery, & Taubman, 1995;Reid, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%