The More the Better? A Comparison of the Information Sources Used by the Public during Two Infectious Disease Outbreaks

Abstract

Recent infectious disease outbreaks have resulted in renewed recognition of the importance of risk communication planning and execution to public health control strategies. Key to these efforts is public access to information that is understandable, reliable and meets their needs for informed decision-making on protective health behaviours. Learning from the trends in sources used in previous outbreaks will enable improvements in information access in future outbreaks. Two separate random-digit dialled telephone surveys were conducted in Alberta, Canada, to explore information sources used by the public, together with their perceived usefulness and credibility, during the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) epidemic (n = 1209) and 2009–2010 H1N1 pandemic (n = 1206). Traditional mass media were the most used information sources in both surveys. Although use of the Internet increased from 25% during SARS to 56% during H1N1, overall use of social media was not as high as anticipated. Friends and relatives were commonly used as an information source, but were not deemed very useful or credible. Conversely, doctors and health professionals were considered credible, but not consulted as frequently. The use of five or more information sources increased by almost 60% between the SARS and H1N1 surveys. There was a shift to older, more educated and more affluent respondents between the surveys, most likely caused by a decrease in the use of landlines amongst younger Canadians. It was concluded that people are increasingly using multiple sources of health risk information, presumably in a complementary manner. Subsequently, although using online media is important, this should be used to augment rather than replace more traditional information channels. Efforts should be made to improve knowledge transfer to health care professionals and doctors and provide them with opportunities to be more accessible as information sources. Finally, the future use of telephone surveys needs to account for the changing demographics of the respondents accessed through such surveys.

Health Education for Parents During the COVID-19 Outbreak Public Health Education for Parents During the Outbreak of COVID-19: A Rapid Review

“…Six anonymous network sampling surveys (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) were conducted during the COVID-19 outbreak, and the other 18 surveys (15-32) were for SARS and MERS. Nine studies (11,13,15,16,18,20,22,43,44) mentioned the channels from where people obtained health education information. We also found out three studies about health education campaigns (33)(34)(35).…”

Media coverage of mercury contamination in the Canadian Arctic

“…Newspapers are one form of media that southern populations (Jardine et al 2015) and Arctic residents use to seek information about health risks (Boyd et al 2011). For example, a study of residents in two communities in the Northwest Territories found that over half of participants used newspapers to find information about health risks (Boyd et al 2011).…”

Adequacy of public health communications on H7N9 and MERS in Singapore: insights from a community based cross-sectional study

“…Understanding how the public gathers information on infectious diseases, and what media channels are preferred to deliver customized messages before an outbreak, equips the government with useful information for risk communication planning [21,22]. Credible and timely message delivery through appropriate media channels is necessary to ensure the public gets accurate information on emerging infectious diseases to make informed decisions on protective health behaviors [23,24]. Studies have also shown that inconsistent and untargeted risk communication messages may result in gaps in health-related knowledge and eventually, health outcomes [25][26][27].…”