2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2021.107477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The more sheltered, the better – Coastal bays and lagoons are important reproduction habitats for pike in the northern Baltic Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The close match of observed and predicted values showed the seasonal amplitude was robust against variations of δ 18 O Water , which agreed with previous work on pike (Gerdeaux & Dufour, 2012). Lower minimum and maximum δ 18 O Otolith than predicted were likely because temperature was measured in pelagic zones of the lagoons, whereas pike in the Baltic often seek warmer, sheltered habitats in shallow areas (Pursiainen et al, 2021). Further, some pike in the Baltic Sea increase their body temperature during winter months by sunbathing (Nordahl et al, 2019), which might offset δ 18 O Otolith to lower values than would be expected from ambient water temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The close match of observed and predicted values showed the seasonal amplitude was robust against variations of δ 18 O Water , which agreed with previous work on pike (Gerdeaux & Dufour, 2012). Lower minimum and maximum δ 18 O Otolith than predicted were likely because temperature was measured in pelagic zones of the lagoons, whereas pike in the Baltic often seek warmer, sheltered habitats in shallow areas (Pursiainen et al, 2021). Further, some pike in the Baltic Sea increase their body temperature during winter months by sunbathing (Nordahl et al, 2019), which might offset δ 18 O Otolith to lower values than would be expected from ambient water temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within specific bays, the variability in eDNA concentrations across transects was without typical patterns (Figures S1 and S5). We initially predicted that the central transect (D), which was situated in the deeper part of the bay, would consistently show lower DNA concentrations because it normally would fall outside the preferred vegetated habitat of spawning pike (Frost & Kipling, 1967; Pursiainen et al, 2021). This was however not the case and we found no such discernible patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within specific bays, the variability in eDNA concentrations across transects was without typical patterns (Figure S 1, Figure S 5). We initially predicted that the central transect (D), which was situated in the deeper part of the bay, would consistently show lower DNA concentrations because it normally would fall outside the preferred vegetated habitat of spawning pike (Frost and Kipling 1967, Pursiainen et al 2021). This was however not the case and we found no such discernible patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%