2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The morbidity of Clostridium difficile infection after elective colonic resection—results from a national population database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A Canadian study cited an occurrence of 14.9 per 1000 postoperative hospitalized patients between 2003 and 2005. 21 Two previous US studies showed that the occurrence of CDAD following colectomy was 22,23 These rates are higher than in the colectomy group in our study (0.37%). The reason for this discrepancy may be that the high CDAD occurrence rates in the previous North American studies were associated with the emergence of a novel hypervirulent strain.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…A Canadian study cited an occurrence of 14.9 per 1000 postoperative hospitalized patients between 2003 and 2005. 21 Two previous US studies showed that the occurrence of CDAD following colectomy was 22,23 These rates are higher than in the colectomy group in our study (0.37%). The reason for this discrepancy may be that the high CDAD occurrence rates in the previous North American studies were associated with the emergence of a novel hypervirulent strain.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…1417 However, the recent time frame, diverse surgical population, and prospective data collection with 30-day follow-up are unique to this report. In the year the data were collected (2012-2013), the majority of Michigan hospitals had adopted PCR diagnostic testing methodology, which is more sensitive and specific and therefore has fewer false positive results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e majority of costs were calculated over the duration of a hospital stay (39 studies, 87% ( 4-8,34,35,37-45,47,49-52, 54-70,72 )). In addition, the most common resource and cost source was large health administrative databases (29 studies, 64% ( 6,8,34,(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(49)(50)(51)(52)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61)63,65,69 )). …”
Section: Coi Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies met the following quality criteria: mentioned the time horizon for which costs were calculated over (45 studies, 100% (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)), stated the cost outcomes being evaluated (43 studies, 96% (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)34,), reported the resource utilization variables separately from unit costs (40 studies, 89% ( 4-8, 35-52,54-58,60,62-70,72,73 )), described the resource utilization and cost sources (38 studies, 84% (4)(5)(6)8,(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69)(70)(71)…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of Coi Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%