2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The moral foundations of makerspaces as unconventional sources of innovation: A study of narratives and performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are seen as a variety of collaborative spaces for experimentation, tinkering, and innovation [32] that complement other educational environments [74]. The availability of various facilities, including shaped spatial architecture and infrastructure, stimulate the innovativeness of the users operating in these makerspaces [9,32,33,91]. It is suggested that rounded versus angular physical work environment is more likely to enhance divergent creativity [90].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are seen as a variety of collaborative spaces for experimentation, tinkering, and innovation [32] that complement other educational environments [74]. The availability of various facilities, including shaped spatial architecture and infrastructure, stimulate the innovativeness of the users operating in these makerspaces [9,32,33,91]. It is suggested that rounded versus angular physical work environment is more likely to enhance divergent creativity [90].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is argued that the exchange of ideas, information, and resources that typically occurs in makerspaces promotes innovation (Beltagui et al, 2021). Despite the growing understanding of makerspaces as being conducive for innovation practices, there is a lack of theoretical explanation for how they do so and what underlying mechanisms are at play (Oswald and Zhao, 2021;Gantert et al, 2022). Further, the way in which innovation practices are formed in makerspaces has been particularly overlooked in the K-12 context (Rouse and Rouse, 2022).…”
Section: Open Access Edited Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research suggests that the innovative potential of makerspaces lies in their rich technological resources, conjoined with a particular social climate conducive to innovation activity. For example, Gantert et al (2022Gantert et al ( , p. 1565) explain makerspaces' innovative potential with a conceptual model called "the trinity of makerspaces, " consisting of technical, social, and cognitive aspects. According to this conceptual model, the rich technological resources (technical level), the self-governing structure and participants' sense of community (social level), and features such as collaboration, open transfer of knowledge, and mentorship (cognitive level) are key features that advance the creation of innovations in makerspaces (see also Vinodrai et al, 2021).…”
Section: Makerspaces Promoting Innovation Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies that capture the significance of innovation in enterprise activities gained much attention after the seminar by Griliches (1979) and Mario et al (2018) . Innovation management researchers have since then advanced the scholarly discourse on the link between innovation and its associated effect on organizational performance ( Li and Wang, 2016 ; Jeff et al, 2020 ; Chao et al, 2022 ; Gantert et al, 2022 ). China is recognized globally for its enormous production capabilities ( Hyejin et al, 2018 ; David et al, 2019 ; Mingshan et al, 2019 ; Yongtao et al, 2022 ); hence studies that seek to establish how the innovation influences the performance of Chinese firms are imperative in current times ( Diéguez-Soto et al, 2019 ; He, 2019 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%