1982
DOI: 10.9783/9781934536377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Monuments and Inscriptions of Tikal--The Carved Monuments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The tombs with texts all date to times when a given ruler was alive and in the mid-point of their reign. This is a very different situation than what is reported for Pakal at Palenque (Stuart 2005;Tiesler and Cucina 2006) or for Jasaw Chan K'awiil at Tikal (Coe 1990;Jones and Satterthwaite 1982), both of whom are associated with dated texts. The tombs that have been recovered at Caracol indicate many more significant individuals than are indicated in the hieroglyphic texts, perhaps suggesting that Marcus' (1992) view of Maya history as manufactured propaganda may have more applicability than we care to admit.…”
Section: History and Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 42%
“…The tombs with texts all date to times when a given ruler was alive and in the mid-point of their reign. This is a very different situation than what is reported for Pakal at Palenque (Stuart 2005;Tiesler and Cucina 2006) or for Jasaw Chan K'awiil at Tikal (Coe 1990;Jones and Satterthwaite 1982), both of whom are associated with dated texts. The tombs that have been recovered at Caracol indicate many more significant individuals than are indicated in the hieroglyphic texts, perhaps suggesting that Marcus' (1992) view of Maya history as manufactured propaganda may have more applicability than we care to admit.…”
Section: History and Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 42%
“…724 – 661 = 63 years). They also provide a growth rate of sapodilla at 1.185 mm per year (cf., Jones and Satterthwaite ), yielding a result of 2.9 inches (63 × 1.185 = 74.7 mm; 74.7 mm ÷ 25.4 mm per inch = 2.9 inches). These 2.9 inches correspond to the amount of material that would have been removed for Kennett et al ’s results to be accurate and the lintel wood to have been procured for the building of Jasaw Chan K'awiil's funerary monument.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 Similarly, Tikal Altar 5 appears to depict the exhumation of a named ancestor. 66,69 At the same time, there are several known deposits of decapitated skulls that appear to be the product of individual or mass human sacri-®ce. 70 Where might Oaxacan ancestral skulls have come from?…”
Section: The Signi®cance Of Isolated Cranial Intermentsmentioning
confidence: 99%