2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00029-016-0255-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The monotone wrapped Fukaya category and the open-closed string map

Abstract: Abstract. We build the wrapped Fukaya category W(E) for any monotone symplectic manifold E, convex at infinity. We define the open-closed and closed open-string maps, OC : HH * (W(E)) → SH * (E) and CO : SH * (E) → HH * (W(E)). We study their algebraic properties and prove that the string maps are compatible with the c 1 (T E)-eigenvalue splitting of W(E). We extend Abouzaid's generation criterion from the exact to the monotone setting. We construct an acceleration functor AF : F (E) → W(E) from the compact Fu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
112
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also a reduced symplectic cohomology group SH * (E) red (see e.g. [3]), which fits into a long exact sequence As should already be obvious from the discussion so far, we do not require that [ω E ] ∈ H 2 (E; R) is trivial, or even that it vanishes on spherical homology classes (such assumptions occur in most, but not all, of the literature concerning symplectic cohomology; among the exceptions are [33,18,17]). Eventually, we will impose a vanishing condition, but one which is weaker and not expressed in terms of classical topology:…”
Section: The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is also a reduced symplectic cohomology group SH * (E) red (see e.g. [3]), which fits into a long exact sequence As should already be obvious from the discussion so far, we do not require that [ω E ] ∈ H 2 (E; R) is trivial, or even that it vanishes on spherical homology classes (such assumptions occur in most, but not all, of the literature concerning symplectic cohomology; among the exceptions are [33,18,17]). Eventually, we will impose a vanishing condition, but one which is weaker and not expressed in terms of classical topology:…”
Section: The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous discussion of connections on A ∞ -algebras carries over without any difficulties to the categorical case. The Hochschild (co)homology of W(E) is related to symplectic cohomology by open-closed string maps [1,10,33] SH * (E) −→ HH * (W(E), W(E)),…”
Section: Motivation and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denote by C the full subcategory formed by T 1 , · · ·, T p , from the above we see that the open-closed map OC restricted on C hits an invertible element of QH * Bl K (C 2 ) λ . By the generation criterion obtained in [38], the claim follows.…”
Section: Lemma 53 There Is a Diffeomorphism Between Moduli Spacesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…If X is non-compact then, as in Remark 1.7, we should instead work with the wrapped Fukaya category W(X). We should also replace quantum cohomology with symplectic cohomology (the 'wrapped' equivalent) in the closed-open map, which yields the informal conjectural isomorphism There is expected to be an acceleration map QH * (X) → SH * (X) (and a corresponding functor F(X) → W(X); see [36]) and Corollary 3 identifies its domain as the right-hand side of (4) but with the 'numerator' replaced by its subring Λ H ∆ .…”
Section: Mirror Symmetry Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%