2013
DOI: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The monomer-dimer problem and moment Lyapunov exponents of homogeneous Gaussian random fields

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to obtain an asymptotic expansion of (2.1), which allows us to obtain its scaling properties, we will use a connection between the monomer-dimer problem and Gaussian moments [2,14]. Following the same argument of [2] one finds Proposition 2.1.…”
Section: The Pure Hard-core Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain an asymptotic expansion of (2.1), which allows us to obtain its scaling properties, we will use a connection between the monomer-dimer problem and Gaussian moments [2,14]. Following the same argument of [2] one finds Proposition 2.1.…”
Section: The Pure Hard-core Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we recall the definition of a monomer-dimer model with pure hard-core interaction and we show how to write its partition function as a Gaussian expectation. This representation, which will be extensively used in this work, was first proposed in [31] and is an immediate consequence of the Wick-Isserlis formula for Gaussian moments. As a first application we show in this section that the well-known Heilmann-Lieb recursion formula [16] for monomer-dimer models corresponds in fact to a Gaussian integration by parts.…”
Section: Gaussian Representation For Monomer-dimer Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Z (0) N (b ′ ) denotes the partition function ZN (a = 0, b = b ′ ) of the model without attractive interaction. Now we use the Wick-Isserlis rule to decouple the hard-core interaction, as was shown in [5,28]. Choosing σ 2 = N −1 and A ⊆ VN in (18), the non-attractive partition function rewrites as…”
Section: Definitions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%