2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11408.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Monitor project: data processing and light curve production

Abstract: International audienceWe have begun a large-scale photometric survey of nearby open clusters and star-forming regions, the Monitor project, aiming to measure time-series photometry for >10000 cluster members over >10 deg2 of sky, to find low-mass eclipsing binary and planet systems. We describe the software pipeline we have developed for this project, showing that we can achieve peak rms accuracy over the entire data set of better than ~2 mmag using aperture photometry, with rms <1 per cent over ~4 mag, in dat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
132
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obvious rise of the lower envelope at faint magnitudes is a combination of the standard deviations (root-mean-squares) from Poisson noise in the targets and from sky noise in the photometric aperture (e.g. Irwin et al 2007). The line used as the selection criterion is the lower envelope shifted to larger σ(V 0 )s by magnitude-dependent amounts (roughly 0.06 mag at V 0 ∼ 8.5-11.5 mag, 0.12 mag at V 0 ∼ 12.5 mag, and 0.18 mag at V 0 ∼ 13.5 mag).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obvious rise of the lower envelope at faint magnitudes is a combination of the standard deviations (root-mean-squares) from Poisson noise in the targets and from sky noise in the photometric aperture (e.g. Irwin et al 2007). The line used as the selection criterion is the lower envelope shifted to larger σ(V 0 )s by magnitude-dependent amounts (roughly 0.06 mag at V 0 ∼ 8.5-11.5 mag, 0.12 mag at V 0 ∼ 12.5 mag, and 0.18 mag at V 0 ∼ 13.5 mag).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data processing and light curve production were performed for each dataset separately, following the procedure described in Irwin et al (2007a). Briefly, a master frame was created by stacking the images taken in the best seeing conditions before using the source detection software.…”
Section: Light Curve Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The J-band images from the WTS are reduced by the image reduction pipeline from the Cambridge Astronomical Survey Unit 3 (CASU), which is used to process all images from the WFCAM. The image reduction pipeline is based on the work developed by Irwin (1985) (Irwin et al 2007). The pipeline includes the following steps: de-biassing and trimming, non-linearity correction, bad pixel replacement, flatfielding, defringing, and sky subtraction.…”
Section: Image Reduction Pipelinementioning
confidence: 99%