The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3444-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Molecular Pathogenesis of Colorectal Cancer and Its Potential Application to Colorectal Cancer Screening

Abstract: Advances in our understanding of the molecular genetics and epigenetics of colorectal cancer has led to novel insights into the pathogenesis of this common cancer. These advances have revealed that there are molecular subtypes of colon polyps and colon cancer and that these molecular subclasses have unique and discrete clinical and pathological features. Although the molecular characterization of these subgroups of colorectal polyps and cancer is only partially understood at this time, it does appear likely th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
137
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
1
137
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are still poorly understood, most likely because of its complexity: hundreds of genes have been shown to induce CIN in yeast, while only around 10 have been identified in humans (Pino & Chung, 2010). Most of these include genes related to chromosome segregation during replication, such as BUB1, BUB1B, and AURKA (Grady & Markowitz, 2015;Pino & Chung, 2010), and genes involved response to DNA damage such as TP53, BRCA1, and BRCA2 (Pino & Chung, 2010).…”
Section: Genomic Events Associated With Carcinogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are still poorly understood, most likely because of its complexity: hundreds of genes have been shown to induce CIN in yeast, while only around 10 have been identified in humans (Pino & Chung, 2010). Most of these include genes related to chromosome segregation during replication, such as BUB1, BUB1B, and AURKA (Grady & Markowitz, 2015;Pino & Chung, 2010), and genes involved response to DNA damage such as TP53, BRCA1, and BRCA2 (Pino & Chung, 2010).…”
Section: Genomic Events Associated With Carcinogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, early diagnosis and prediction of potential metastasis or recurrence show the greatest potential for mCRC therapy. There are a few of tumor biomarkers currently applied for prediction of CRC prognosis, such as gene mutations status of Kras, Braf, PI3K, TP53, and microsatellite instability (MSI) for selection of PD-1 inhibitor in the literature (4)(5)(6). It is still pivotal to find additional molecular biomarkers for clinical translation in CRC, especially those that can predict potential tumor recurrence or metastasis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, promising therapy for CRC is not available, for the molecular mechanisms of CRC development and progression remain ambiguous. Thus, better understanding the pathogenesis of CRC and exploring novel targets is of crucial significance for CRC treatment [2]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%