2014
DOI: 10.1039/c4cp00555d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The molecular configuration of a DOPA/ST monolayer at the air–water interface: a molecular dynamics study

Abstract: In this study, surface pressure-area isotherms for N-stearoyldopamine (DOPA) and 4-stearylcatechol (ST) monolayers are obtained by means of molecular dynamics simulations and compared to experimental isotherms. The difference between DOPA and ST is an amide group, which is present in the alkyl tails of DOPA molecules. We find a large difference between the isotherms for DOPA and ST monolayers. Upon using TIP4P/2005 for water and OPLS force fields for the organic material and a relatively large system size, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulations were performed using GROMACS-5.1.1, 43 and visual molecular dynamics (VMD) 44 was used for visualization of the droplet at the intermediate stages. Extended simple point charge (SPC/E) 45 water model was used for defining water molecules.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations were performed using GROMACS-5.1.1, 43 and visual molecular dynamics (VMD) 44 was used for visualization of the droplet at the intermediate stages. Extended simple point charge (SPC/E) 45 water model was used for defining water molecules.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations reported herein were carried out using GROMACS-4.0.7 20-21-22 whereas Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD) 23 was used for intermittent visualization of the droplet configuration. The well-known L-J [U LJ (r)] potential was used to model the system, 12 6…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides that, most molecular modeling approaches to surfactant monolayer formation and resulting surface tension have applied to various lung surfactants and other lipid-based monolayer assemblies because of the biological relevance (e.g., refs ). Martinez et al have examined via molecular modeling SDS monolayers, Phan et al have examined MIBC/CTAB mixtures, and Kong et al have examined simpler biosurfactants at different surface concentrations and have connected the findings to surface tension. The surface coverage dependency of surfactant aggregate morphologies at the interface has also received some molecular modeling attention for various surfactants (e.g., refs ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%