The Molecular Evolutionary Clock 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-60181-2_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Molecular Clock and Evolutionary Rates Across the Tree of Life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 167 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past two decades, a number of relaxed-clock models have been developed for dating divergence events on phylogenies, allowing the substitution rate to change over time and among branches of the phylogeny; see Yang (2014 , Chapter 10) and Ho (2022) for comprehensive reviews. Thorne et al (1998) and Kishino et al (2001) developed the earliest models, using geometric Brownian motion (GBM) to describe the evolution in the rate of molecular evolution; in other words, the logarithm of the rate drifts over time like Brownian motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the past two decades, a number of relaxed-clock models have been developed for dating divergence events on phylogenies, allowing the substitution rate to change over time and among branches of the phylogeny; see Yang (2014 , Chapter 10) and Ho (2022) for comprehensive reviews. Thorne et al (1998) and Kishino et al (2001) developed the earliest models, using geometric Brownian motion (GBM) to describe the evolution in the rate of molecular evolution; in other words, the logarithm of the rate drifts over time like Brownian motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later developments include the use of dated fossils and joint analysis of morphological characters and molecular alignments in the so-called tip-dating or total-evidence dating analyses (e.g., Ronquist et al 2012 ; Heath et al 2014 ; Zhang et al 2016 ; Alvarez-Carretero et al 2019 ). See dos Reis et al (2016) , Lee and Ho (2016) and Ho (2022) for recent reviews.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been suggested that biotic drivers play a major role in the expansion phase, whereas abiotic drivers are more influential in the retraction phase [ 29 ]. In all these works, the duration of taxon cycles was deduced from phylogenetic divergence times, which are usually estimated using molecular clock assumptions or are modeled using a variety of indirect methods [ 30 ]. Therefore, phylogenetic divergence times are hypotheses, not empirical evidence [ 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors can contribute to TDRP such as incomplete purifying selection [6,7], accelerated evolution upon introduction to a new host environment [8,9], and site substitution saturation [2,10]. In addition to these biological processes, several other factors such as misspecification of substitution models can also contribute to time-dependent changes in the evolutionary rate estimates [11]. In a recent work [10], a mechanistic evolutionary model, also known as the Prisoner of War (PoW) model, was proposed that readily explains and corrects for time-dependent rate effects across deep evolutionary timescales and reproduces the empirically observed power-law rate decay found for RNA and DNA viruses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%