1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb51294.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Molecular Basis of Anticholinesterase Actions on Nicotinic and Glutamatergic Synapsesa

Abstract: INTRODUmIONIn the last 15 years, our knowledge of receptor function has been advanced considerably by studies of the acetylcholine-receptor-ion-channel complex (AChR) of the neuromuscular junction. The Occurrence of nicotinic AChRs at very high densities in Torpedo and Electrophorus electric organs made this membrane receptor easily available for study. In addition, specific chemical probes for the different active sites have contributed significantly to our understanding of the morphology and function of this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physostigmine exerts stimulating, desensitizing, and blocking actions at nicotinic receptors in addition to its AChE-inhibitory actions at the neuromuscular junction. The agonist effects of physostigmine were observed as early as 1977 (137) and confirmed a number of times (11,202,203,228,233,234). Further support for these actions additional to AChE inhibition, stems from observations that (+) physostigmine, which is virtually devoid of AChE-inhibitory activity, is an agonist at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (11).…”
Section: Actions At Nicotinic Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Physostigmine exerts stimulating, desensitizing, and blocking actions at nicotinic receptors in addition to its AChE-inhibitory actions at the neuromuscular junction. The agonist effects of physostigmine were observed as early as 1977 (137) and confirmed a number of times (11,202,203,228,233,234). Further support for these actions additional to AChE inhibition, stems from observations that (+) physostigmine, which is virtually devoid of AChE-inhibitory activity, is an agonist at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (11).…”
Section: Actions At Nicotinic Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The agonist effects of physostigmine were observed as early as 1977 (137) and confirmed a number of times (11,202,203,228,233,234). Further support for these actions additional to AChE inhibition, stems from observations that (+) physostigmine, which is virtually devoid of AChE-inhibitory activity, is an agonist at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (11). Photoaffinity labeling of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by (+) physostigmine has revealed a pharmacologically distinct drug binding site carried on the same subunit as that for acetylcholine (246).…”
Section: Actions At Nicotinic Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Because the individual (+)Antx-induced openings were also shortened, the resulting bursts remained shorter than those activated by ACh. The channel bursts induced in the CNS neurons by (+)Antx at micromolar concentration did not resemble those elicited by desensitizing concentrations of agonists [13,32,37,38], by open channel blockers such as QX222 [39] or anticholinesterase agents such as neostigmine and edrophonium [38]. Rather, as reported for muscles [ 13,401, these fast closures observed with (+ )Antx probably resulted from relatively more rapid transitions from the closed, doubly-agonist-bound state to the opened state as compared to the rates of dissociation of either of two agonist molecules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This idea seems more likely, as the lone pair of electrons on the tertiary nitrogen atom of VX makes it susceptible to protonation (Epstein et al, 1974 (Albuquerque et al, 1985;Rao et al, 1987;Aracava et al, 1988). VX has also been reported to be a potent inhibitor of [3H]-perhydrohistrionicotoxin binding to the nicotinic cholinoceptor ion channel in both closed and open states, but predominantly in the latter (Eldefrawi et al, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%