2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.03.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The molecular analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: Next-generation sequencing supersedes conventional approaches

Abstract: Next-generation sequencing is more sensitive, faster, easier to use and less expensive than the conventional Sanger method. Consequently, it is a reliable procedure for the routine molecular screening of the BRCA1/2 genes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…NGS-based analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were previously reported, including PCR-based library preparation on the Roche sequencer, 10 PCR-based on Ion-Torrent sequencer, 4,12 PCR-based on SOLiD and IoneTorrent sequencers, 13 and RainDance microdroplet …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NGS-based analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were previously reported, including PCR-based library preparation on the Roche sequencer, 10 PCR-based on Ion-Torrent sequencer, 4,12 PCR-based on SOLiD and IoneTorrent sequencers, 13 and RainDance microdroplet …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent improvements to NGS technologies that facilitate massively parallel analysis of multiple genes have enabled the implementation of more cost-effective, rapid, and high-throughput methods to allow precise identification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in these high-risk patients, as well as testing of more comprehensive gene panels for cancer predisposition syndromes. 4,9,10 NGS is also capable of sensitive detection of sequence variants and may also be used for detection of copy number variants (CNVs), such as exon deletions and duplications that currently require use of MLPA or other copy number technologies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focused cancer gene-panels have been most frequently used to date due to cost-efficiency, because the raw data handling and flow of data through bioinformatics pipelines is relatively simple, the demand for server data storage is limited and because they decrease the chance of finding variants of underdetermined/unknown significance (VUS), which are difficult to interpret in clinical management (see also Section 7). In this context, the most straightforward way to overcome these challenges is achieved by restricting the NGS sequencing to the high risk-genes only (targeted re-sequencing), which still presents some advantages and has higher sensitivity compared with traditional methods [61,62]. Although the use of WES and WGS has been less frequent in the past, the decreasing costs and the improvements in pipeline analyses are making these strategies increasingly more suitable and it is envisaged that they will be the preferred approach in the near future.…”
Section: Inherited Cancer Syndromesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our lab experience and several recent papers have demonstrated how NGS methods are adequate to detect point mutations and indels in BRCA1 / BRCA2 genes, revolutionizing this genetic analysis and reducing time and costs 46. This approach in fact is suitable in routine diagnostic workflow, since it is faster and more sensitive than denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography/Sanger sequencing methods.…”
Section: Ngs Analysis For Solid Cancer Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 90%