2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The moisture buffering performance of plasters when exposed to simultaneous sinusoidal temperature and RH variations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specimens were tested in an environmental chamber (ACS Compact Test Chambers DY110), into which a mass balance were placed to continuously measure the change in weight, as shown in Figure 1. More details of the set-up can be seen in [8] The tests followed the general guidelines for humidity variations and test set-up of the NORDTEST protocol [14]. The materials were exposed before each tests to 24 h pre-conditioning at 23 • C and 54%RH, and to six cyclic humidity and temperature variations at an air speed of 0.1 m/s.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specimens were tested in an environmental chamber (ACS Compact Test Chambers DY110), into which a mass balance were placed to continuously measure the change in weight, as shown in Figure 1. More details of the set-up can be seen in [8] The tests followed the general guidelines for humidity variations and test set-up of the NORDTEST protocol [14]. The materials were exposed before each tests to 24 h pre-conditioning at 23 • C and 54%RH, and to six cyclic humidity and temperature variations at an air speed of 0.1 m/s.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of heating and well insulated walls might generate significant daily or seasonal indoor humidity and temperature fluctuations, depending on the climate and location of the building [6,7]. The simultaneous variations of temperature and RH can produce significant variation in moisture exchange between materials and the environment [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common practice adopted for measuring hygroscopic properties of building materials is the NORDTEST [2], and the evaluation of the Moisture Buffering Value (MBV) is the typical method to compare different materials. Usual plasters, such as gypsum and lime, have experienced moderate values of MBV within the range of 0.6-1.5 g/(m 2 %RH) [5] and own the label of moderate and good materials according to NORDTEST. A typical strategy to increase the MBV of construction materials, like cement and limestone, is using additional hygroscopic compounds, like natural or synthetic fibers such as palm and hemp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of zeolite, for example, increases the number of active sites to operate the moisture sorption and desorption that, together with an increase of global porosity, improve the buffering properties of the mortar. Based on this concept, He et al [7] tested a composite mortar based on zeolite (20%wt), PCM, and gypsum, obtaining a practical MBV of 2.9 g/(m 2 %RH), consistently higher than pristine gypsum plaster [5]. An alternative approach belonging to the same category is using hygroscopic polymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, the MBV was determined at a constant temperature (e.g., 23 • C), while, in reality, the indoor temperature in buildings is under variable dynamic conditions. Some experimental studies found in the literature on hygroscopic materials [13,33,34] showed that the MBV is influenced by the temperature and the increase in temperature induces an increase in the MBV. For example, MBVs of palm concrete which were measured at 23 • C and 10 • C by Chennouf et al (2018) [13] were 2.96 and 2.03 g/(m 2 %RH), respectively (with a percentage deviation of 31.42%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%