1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf01406842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The modular symbol and continued fractions in higher dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
78
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Statement (1) of Theorem A.22 is due to Ash and Rudolph [AR79]. Instead of P , they used the larger parallelotope P ′ defined by…”
Section: Wherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statement (1) of Theorem A.22 is due to Ash and Rudolph [AR79]. Instead of P , they used the larger parallelotope P ′ defined by…”
Section: Wherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We begin by recalling some facts from the theory of modular symbols associated to the minimal parabolic subgroup. These facts are equivalent to results in [13], and are just reformulated in terms of tuples and splittings. Let W be the set of all full tuples of 1-dimensional subspaces.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Note that the relations in [12,13] imply that this equality holds true in Proof. We begin by recalling some facts from the theory of modular symbols associated to the minimal parabolic subgroup.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Γ ⊂ SL n (Z), modular symbols provide a concrete method to compute the Hecke eigenvalues in H ν (Y ; M), where ν = n(n+1)/2−1 is the top nonvanishing degree [8,23]. Using modular symbols many people have studied the arithmetic significance of this cohomology group, especially for n = 2 and 3 [3,6,7,12,25,26]; these are the only two values of n for which H ν (Y ; M) can contain cuspidal cohomology classes, in other words cohomology classes coming from cuspidal automorphic forms on GL(n).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%