2010
DOI: 10.3109/09638280903171576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Modified Rivermead Mobility Index: Reliability and convergent validity in a mixed neurological population

Abstract: The MRMI was shown to have high levels of reliability in a mixed neurological population but we recommend that its psychometric properties are further investigated to establish the true clinical utility of this measure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the scale is focused on impairment and disability. It has excellent inter‐rater reliability and good internal consistency and convergent validity in a mixed neurologic population …”
Section: Case Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the scale is focused on impairment and disability. It has excellent inter‐rater reliability and good internal consistency and convergent validity in a mixed neurologic population …”
Section: Case Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has excellent inter-rater reliability and good internal consistency and convergent validity in a mixed neurologic population. 2 All patients received inpatient treatment. They underwent an assessment by the physiotherapist, including an analysis of their ability to perform functional tasks, such as moving from lie to sit, sitting balance and alignment, sit to stand, assessment of weight bearing, and standing alignment.…”
Section: Case Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this, an 8min walking test was completed on a 60-m floor walking track, with walking heart rate and distance recorded. Finally, the Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI), a measure of functional mobility, was completed (Lennon and Johnson, 2000;Walsh et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary outcome measures include; lower limb joint kinematics (thigh and shank global orientations) & kinetics (knee and hip flexion/extension moments, ground reaction force FZ 2 peak magnitude), step length, symmetry ratio based on step length [23], Modified Ashworth Scale [24], Modified Rivermead Mobility Index [25,26], EuroQol (EQ-5D) [27]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%