2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03).
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2003.1198718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The modified group delay function and its application to phoneme recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, it can only be used for MFCC or log filterbank energies (FBE) and can not be directly applied to representations which -instead of log compression -apply a power transformation to the FBEs. Examples of such features are generalised-MFCC [12], PLP [3], PNCC [5] and phase-based features [4,[13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, it can only be used for MFCC or log filterbank energies (FBE) and can not be directly applied to representations which -instead of log compression -apply a power transformation to the FBEs. Examples of such features are generalised-MFCC [12], PLP [3], PNCC [5] and phase-based features [4,[13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, the zeros near the unit circle in Equation 3 are suppressed by smoothing the magnitude spectrum X(w) [Murthy and Gadde (2003); Hegde et al (2007b)]. The resulting group delay function is well behaved.…”
Section: Modified Group Delay Function (Modgd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…)| using low-order cepstral lifter l w . α, γ and l w are adjusted according to the particular requirements [7]. The GDMD feature is computed in the same way as the MD one, but instead the FFT magnitude spectrum the MGDS is used [12].…”
Section: -4 2014mentioning
confidence: 99%