2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2007.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The modified fuzzy art and a two-stage clustering approach to cell design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adaptive neural networks always had an important role in CM beginning in the early 1990s in the works of Kao and Moon (1991), Malave and Ramachandran (1991), Dagli and Huggahalli (1991) and Moon and Chi (1992). Fuzzy ART was another common adaptive resonance framework as presented in the works of Suresh and Kaparthi (1994), Burke and Kamal (1995), Kamal and Burke (1996), Suresh et al (1999), Peker and Kara (2004), Won and Currie (2007) and Ozdemir et al (2007) that provided a unified architecture for both binary and continuous valued inputs. Fuzzy ART was another common adaptive resonance framework as presented in the works of Suresh and Kaparthi (1994), Burke and Kamal (1995), Kamal and Burke (1996), Suresh et al (1999), Peker and Kara (2004), Won and Currie (2007) and Ozdemir et al (2007) that provided a unified architecture for both binary and continuous valued inputs.…”
Section: Fuzzy Adaptive Resonance Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptive neural networks always had an important role in CM beginning in the early 1990s in the works of Kao and Moon (1991), Malave and Ramachandran (1991), Dagli and Huggahalli (1991) and Moon and Chi (1992). Fuzzy ART was another common adaptive resonance framework as presented in the works of Suresh and Kaparthi (1994), Burke and Kamal (1995), Kamal and Burke (1996), Suresh et al (1999), Peker and Kara (2004), Won and Currie (2007) and Ozdemir et al (2007) that provided a unified architecture for both binary and continuous valued inputs. Fuzzy ART was another common adaptive resonance framework as presented in the works of Suresh and Kaparthi (1994), Burke and Kamal (1995), Kamal and Burke (1996), Suresh et al (1999), Peker and Kara (2004), Won and Currie (2007) and Ozdemir et al (2007) that provided a unified architecture for both binary and continuous valued inputs.…”
Section: Fuzzy Adaptive Resonance Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances incorporate practical consideration such as dynamic cell configuration, alternative routing, sequence of operation, capacity, workload, and setup times [32]. In addition, research in this area have applied advanced tools to classify parts using simulated annealing hybrid algorithms [33] and fuzzy ART neural networks for machine-part clustering based on sequence data [34][35][36][37]. The latter is discussed in further detail in the next section.…”
Section: Group Technology and Cellular Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dagli and Huggahalli used ART1 in such problems while Malave and Ramachandran used competitive learning. Fuzzy ART was another common adaptive resonance framework as presented in the works of Suresh and Kaparthi (1994), Burke and Kamal (1995), Kamal and Burke (1996), Suresh et al (1999), Peker and Kara (2004), Won and Currie (2007) and Ozdemir et al (2007) which provided a unified architecture for both binary and continuous valued inputs. Although fuzzy ART does not require a completely binary representation of the parts to be grouped, it possesses the same desirable stability properties as ART1 and a simpler architecture than that of ART2.…”
Section: Fuzzy Adaptive Resonance Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%