are printed after the text and are followed by a reply from the author.Vol, 11 . No, 3 . J« '" 1973 of personal experience to social institutions, and with the impact of personal choice on social change. Such questions are more likely to be raised by life history studies, those which follow the individual through the course of his career.A life history is the account of a life, completed or ongoing. Such an account obviously involves some kind of selection, since only a very small part of all that the person has experienced can possibly be re corded. Certain salient facts about a person are likely to be recorded by any narrator, but much of any life history has to be chosen for inclusion according to some principles for selection. Often enough, such principles as are used are unstated or unwitting or inchoate. Most social scientists who have pointed out the great potential of the life history approach for their respective disciplines have seen as its chief dif ficulty the lack of accepted principles of selection, of suitable analytic concepts to make up a coherent frame of reference.Three procedural suggestions are given here as a possible start for such a frame. The ideas of the dimensions, turnings, and adaptations in a life history may be useful as guidelines for the collection and analysis of life history data. These ideas are not intended to be inviolable classifications; nor are they substantive concepts, though using them may help us develop such concepts_ Their applicability is illustrat ed with the life history of Gandhi, whose life bears such intrinsic interest that, in this study as in other contexts, it has become something more than an illustration, has taken on, as it were, a life of its own. Garraty 1957). But the study of lives for purposes of social science has been more advocated than prac ticed. At one time the Social Science Research Council gave special attention to the use of life histories and of related personal documents (see Blumer 1939, All port 1942, Gottschalk 1945, Kluckhohn 1945, Angell 1945. Other psychologists and sociologists have also given directives for the study of life history and have outlined programs for research (d. Park and Burgess 1924; BUhler 1933 BUhler , 1968a K. Young 1952; P. Young 1966; Becker 1966; Denzin 1970). But not many have as yet done much recording and analysis of life histories as wholes. Longitudinal studies, nota bly those conducted in the Institute of Human Devel opment at the University of California, Berkeley, have yielded many significant observations of growth and social development, but these have yet to be placed in their social and cultural contexts.
LIFE HISTORY STUDIES IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCESAnthropologists have recorded life histories since the beginnings of the discipline. Many of these have been published (d. Langness 1965: 54-82 The stimulus to record them has been, I believe, not so much the outcome of a deliberate research plan as the result of a characteristic phase of the anthropologist's own life experience. When an an thro...