2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01035-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The modern approach to patent ductus arteriosus treatment: complementary roles of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and interventional cardiology coil occlusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VATS ligation of PDA and transcatheter occlusion are minimally traumatic and complementary techniques for PDA treatment …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…VATS ligation of PDA and transcatheter occlusion are minimally traumatic and complementary techniques for PDA treatment …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residual shunting, coil emboliazation, and reopening after successful coil occlusion are more likely in large PDAs. On the other hand, VATS is contraindicated in patients with calcified ducts, severe pleural scarring, or short, wide, window‐like ducts . There is an agreement that patients with short, wide, window‐like ducts are not candidates for coil occlusion or VATS .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have documented residual and recurrent flow after VATS clipping ranging from 1.4% to 10% during the follow-up period [8,[12][13][14][15], whereas, residual flow after open PDA closure has been seen in 0% to 23% of patients [16,17]. Closure of PDA in the cardiac catheterization laboratory has been increasingly used, but some restrictions on body weight and ductus morphology limit the indication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have documented residual and recurrent fl ow after VATS clipping, ranging from 1.4% to 10% during follow-up, while residual fl ow after open PDA interruption has been seen in 0% to 23% of patients. [5][6][7][8][9] Closure in the catheterization laboratory is performed increasingly, but some restrictions on body weight and ductus morphology limit this possibility. Furthermore, interventional techniques have shown a variable rate of residual patency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%