2010
DOI: 10.2753/joa0091-3367390203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Moderating Influence of Consumers' Temporal Orientation on the Framing of Societal Needs and Corporate Responses in Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some customers intend to buy some products for cause-related reasons, they are willing to buy some accredited products and brands. This result explains the positive effect of credibility on cause-related marketing which is similar to that of Tangari et al (2010) study, which showed that consumers' temporal orientation (present or future) moderates the influence of the temporal framing within the ad (either proximal or distal) for a C-RM campaign on attitudes and purchase intentions.…”
Section: Hypotheses Testingsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, some customers intend to buy some products for cause-related reasons, they are willing to buy some accredited products and brands. This result explains the positive effect of credibility on cause-related marketing which is similar to that of Tangari et al (2010) study, which showed that consumers' temporal orientation (present or future) moderates the influence of the temporal framing within the ad (either proximal or distal) for a C-RM campaign on attitudes and purchase intentions.…”
Section: Hypotheses Testingsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Past research has explored a number of variables that contribute to the effectiveness of CRM, for example message framing (Grau and Folse 2007), donation size and type (Folse, Niedrich, and Grau 2010;Hyllegard et al 2011), type of cause (Ellen, Mohr, and Webb 2000;Harben and Forsythe 2011), temporal dimensions of the campaign (Tangari et al 2010), perceived compatibility between the brand and cause (Gupta and Pirsch 2006), perceived firm motivation (Barone, Norman, and Miyazaki 2007), product type (Strahilevitz and Myers 1998), brand involvement (Chowdhury and Khare 2011) and personal characteristics of the consumer (Youn and Kim 2008). This body of work provides evidence that under certain conditions, CRM is favorably regarded by the consumer and can offer a range of benefits including positive associations for the firm (Folse, Niedrich, and Grau 2010), enhanced brand attitude (Lafferty and Goldsmith 2005) and switching behavior and purchase intention (Lafferty, Goldsmith, and Hult 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11, No. 11;(Tangari, Folse, Burton, & Kees, 2010 The organizations should expand their efforts in creating a positive attitude towards CrM campaigns for benefits of brand and consumer participation. (Folse, Niedrich, & Grau, 2010) The larger donation size of CrM campaign will help the consumer understand the altruistic motives of organizations and if the purchase quantity is higher than expected, a negative attitude results towards CrM campaigns.…”
Section: Consumer Attitude and Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%