“…This variation is not accounted for by objective stressors but rather by the subjective appraisal of caring, which, in turn, depends on the evaluation of resources available for coping (Nolan et al, 1996). For example, studies on caregivers show that mastery is linked to fewer depressive symptoms, anxiety, caregiver burden, and psychological distress (Adams et al, 2005;Clair et al, 1995;Pioli, 2010;Soskolne et al, 2007), that sense of control is negatively related to caregiver depression (Miller et al, 1995), that self-efficacy, optimism, and selfesteem show positive correlations with the caregivers' capability to "live well" (Lamont et al, 2019), and that sense of coherence, generalized self-efficacy, and perceived social support are negatively associated with caregiver burden (Soltys et al, 2021;Turró-Garriga et al, 2020). Since one can realize the positive potential of resources only by activating and, consequently, utilizing available resources in prevention and intervention research about family caregivers, it is essential to measure psychosocial resource utilization with psychometrically sound instruments.…”