The Moderating Effects of Collectivistic Orientation on Psychological Ownership and Constructive Deviant Behavior

Chung, Yang Woon; Moon, Hyoung Koo

doi:10.5539/ijbm.v6n12p65

Cited by 28 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 81 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, its relation to constructive deviant behaviors is rarely studied (Chung & Moon, 2011). Therefore, in the present study, we propose that using some new predictors with the mediating effect of psychological ownership can advance our understanding of constructive deviance construct.…”

Section: Constructive Deviant Workplace Behaviors and Psychological Omentioning

confidence: 91%

“…The antecedents of constructive deviant behaviors such as; psychological ownership (Chung & Moon, 2011;Vandewalle et al, 1995), personality traits (Big Five) (Bodankin & Tziner, 2009), cultural factors (Galperin, 2002) and leader-member-exchange (Tziner et al, 2010) have been widely studied in last decade. However, in Vadera and www.ccsenet.org/ibr International Business Research Vol.…”

Section: Constructive Deviant Workplace Behaviors and Psychological Omentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Chung & Moon, 2011;Avey et al, 2009;Vandewalle et al, 1995;Avey et al, 2012;Buchko, 1993;O"driscoll et al, 2006). Pierce and colleagues (2003) defined psychological ownership as "that state where an individual feels as though the target of ownership or a piece of that target is "theirs" (i.e., it is MINE!)".…”

Section: Constructive Deviant Workplace Behaviors and Psychological Omentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In another study, a positive relationship was found between ethical climate and organizational performance (Elç i et al, 2004). On the other hand, many researches on constructive deviance have been studied with related to some personality traits, perceptions, attitudes and behaviors (Chung & Moon, 2011;Vandewalle et al, 1995;Bodankin & Tziner, 2009;Galperin, 2012;Tziner et al, 2010). Despite the numerous studies, there are paucity of research investigating the relationship between ethical ideology (idealism and relativism) and workplace deviance Hastings & Finegan, 2011).…”

Section: Mediator Role Of Psychological Ownership In the Relation Of mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(Mayhew et al, 2007;Pierce et al, 2004;Avey et al, 2009;Sieger et al, 2013). However, there are limited researches focusing on the relationship between psychological ownership and constructive deviance (Chung & Moon, 2011). In their study, Chung and Moon (2011) found a positive and significant relationship between interpersonal constructive deviance and psychological ownership.…”

Section: Mediator Role Of Psychological Ownership In the Relation Of mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Determinants of Constructive Deviance: The Mediator Role of Psychological Ownership

Yıldız¹,

Alpkan²,

Ateş³

et al. 2015

IBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Today"s organizations are more flexible, creative, innovative and decentralized than past organizations. Constructive deviant workplace behaviors have a vital importance for organizations in terms of their positive effects. Although numerous researchers in the literature have tried to determine and clarify antecedents and consequences of constructive deviant behaviors, studies on both psychological ownership and constructive deviance are limited. In this respect, after a literature review on the concept of constructive workplace deviance, this paper provides a theoretical framework on some rarely studied predictors (i.e. psychological ownership, participative decision making, person-organization fit, idealism, justice perception), where psychological ownership is supposed to play a mediator role. Managerial and further research implications are provided.

show abstract

Section: Constructive Deviant Workplace Behaviors and Psychological Omentioning

confidence: 91%

Section: Constructive Deviant Workplace Behaviors and Psychological Omentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Constructive Deviant Workplace Behaviors and Psychological Omentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Mediator Role Of Psychological Ownership In the Relation Of mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Mediator Role Of Psychological Ownership In the Relation Of mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Determinants of Constructive Deviance: The Mediator Role of Psychological Ownership

Yıldız¹,

Alpkan²,

Ateş³

et al. 2015

IBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Prospective intervention opportunities regarding device ownership and the reduction of damage to handheld ruggedized devices with shift workers

Burch

Strawderman

Cannon

et al. 2018

Hum Ftrs & Erg Mfg Svc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Industrial equipment such as ruggedized handheld computers, scanners, and label printers used within asset tracking environments are expensive to purchase and costly to repair. For organizations that use this equipment, there is value in understanding when and why damage occurs and how much of those costs are potentially associated with the employees’ own sense of psychological ownership and organizational pride. Given the connection between psychological ownership and pride, the purpose of this study was to analyze employee surveys to determine what methods, tools, or programs could reduce repair and replacement while developing a stronger sense of ownership for ruggedized devices used in material‐handling industries by shift workers. Unstructured interviews about device repair with management from a large industrial company were utilized to create a multiple‐choice, anonymous online survey (n = 353). Of the six interventions proposed, assigning the same device to the same employee every shift appeared to have the most consistent and positive response. Destruction rates and costs should be posted for employee viewing and managers of workgroups with consistently high destruction rates should receive additional training. An incentive‐based program for employees responsible for the least amount of device damage as well as an individual‐assignment of devices to employees may be considered. Applications for this student include providing a tool with which organizations can use to gauge employee ownership of equipment as well as to identify interventions that may aid in mitigating expenses associated with industrially rugged equipment.

show abstract

Psychological Ownership and Openness to Change: The Mediating Effects of Work Engagement, and Knowledge Creation

Chai¹,

Song²,

You³

2020

Perf Improvement Qrtly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While most studies on psychological ownership have examined the effect on work-related attitudes and behaviors, little research has focused on knowledge-creation practices and openness to change. Another concern is that most research on psychological ownership that has been conducted has mainly focused on private-sector organizations. In contrast, research on this topic in the public sector is scarce. Although public-sector organizations have become more competitive with the shift toward a performance-oriented paradigm and openness to change, the findings in the private-sector organizational context may not be applicable in a public-sector organizational context. Despite public = sector organizations' efforts to change, the organizational cultures of public and private sector organizations are still quite different (Choi & Park, 2014; Suh, Harrington, & Goodman, 2018). Most importantly, employees in public-sector organizations may conceptualize their psychological ownership differently in that the employees may have only psychological ownership. In contrast, employees in private organizations may have both legal and psychological ownership. Therefore, it is critical to explore the relationships among psychological ownership, engagement, change, and creation/innovation in the public-sector organizational context. Another limitation of previous studies is the lack of knowledge about psychological ownership in diverse cultural contexts. While much research on psychological ownership has been conducted in Western cultural contexts, very few studies have been conducted in non-Western cultural contexts (e.g., collectivistic and hierarchical cultures). Since the concept and measures of psychological ownership have been developed and validated in Western contexts, it is critical to validate them in the non-Western organizational and culture contexts (e.g., South Korea) to further explore the implications of the concept and measures. With advancements in South Korea's (Korea hereafter) industrial structure, the need for change and creativity has become inevitable in publicsector organizations to support the quickly transforming society and private-sector organizations (De Vries, Bekkers, & Tummers, 2016; Suh et al., 2018). Thus, the current study aims to examine the effects of psychological ownership on work engagement, knowledge creation, and openness to change in a Korean publicsector organization. Further, we examine the direct relationships among the constructs and the mediation effects of work engagement and knowledge creation in this context.

show abstract

The Moderating Effects of Collectivistic Orientation on Psychological Ownership and Constructive Deviant Behavior

Cited by 28 publications

References 81 publications

Determinants of Constructive Deviance: The Mediator Role of Psychological Ownership

Determinants of Constructive Deviance: The Mediator Role of Psychological Ownership

Prospective intervention opportunities regarding device ownership and the reduction of damage to handheld ruggedized devices with shift workers

Psychological Ownership and Openness to Change: The Mediating Effects of Work Engagement, and Knowledge Creation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About