2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10899-013-9409-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Moderating Effect of Gender on the Relation Between Expectancies and Gambling Frequency Among College Students

Abstract: Compared to college females, college males are more likely to report frequent gambling. Research on gambling outcome expectancies has shown that expectations about gambling influence gambling behavior and that endorsement of particular expectancies differs by gender. Knowledge regarding the differential predictive utility of specific gambling expectancies based on gender would help to determine how beliefs about gambling may be fundamentally different for men and women. The present study explored whether gende… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the role of gender as a moderator in the relationship between internet gaming disorder and self-appraisal among university students, results of which reveals that gender act as a negative significant moderator which shows that gender is moderating the relationship between internet gaming disorder and self-appraisal (Table 3). This result is supported by previous research, a study conducted (Teeters, Ginley, Whelan, Meyers, & Pearlson, 2015) to check whether gender moderates the relationship between gaming expectancy and gaming frequency thus revealed that gender moderated the relationship between the expectancies of social consequences, material gain, and gaming frequency. Also a meta analysis was conducted to examine gender related differences in specific internet addiction revealed that gender worked as a moderator in internet gaming disorder and social media addiction (Su, Han, Yu, Wu, & Potenza, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…To assess the role of gender as a moderator in the relationship between internet gaming disorder and self-appraisal among university students, results of which reveals that gender act as a negative significant moderator which shows that gender is moderating the relationship between internet gaming disorder and self-appraisal (Table 3). This result is supported by previous research, a study conducted (Teeters, Ginley, Whelan, Meyers, & Pearlson, 2015) to check whether gender moderates the relationship between gaming expectancy and gaming frequency thus revealed that gender moderated the relationship between the expectancies of social consequences, material gain, and gaming frequency. Also a meta analysis was conducted to examine gender related differences in specific internet addiction revealed that gender worked as a moderator in internet gaming disorder and social media addiction (Su, Han, Yu, Wu, & Potenza, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Rigorous empirical SCM or logistics research that discusses the moderating effect of gender and education in relationships involving attitudinal change is scarce. A moderating impact of gender has been found in research areas as diverse as computing efficacy (Lee and Huang, 2014), gambling (Teeters et al, 2015) and technology adoption (Riquelme and Rios, 2010), but the proposed models in these cases are significantly different from the study design in this paper. Similarly, differences in school types and education have been shown to have moderating effects in varying learning environments (Strolin-Goltzman et al, 2012), but their findings cannot easily be transferred to the context of this study.…”
Section: Sustainable Transport Educationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In detail, they correspond to such a thought: "After engaging in one behaviour, I expect X (Kuntsche et al 2010). In the gambling field, OEs refer to the anticipated positive/negative outcomes that occur from one's gambling behaviour (Stewart et al 2005;Stewart et al 2014). Research shows that positive OEs (e.g., Emond et al 2010;Michalczuk et al 2011;Teeters et al 2015) and negative OEs (e.g., St-Pierre et al 2014;Wickwire et al 2010;Wohl et al 2006) have a role in predicting problem gambling in young people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%